Clinical effects of revision total knee arthroplasty:a comparative analysis between osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis

SHENG Pu-yi,ZHANG Zi-ji,KANG Yan,LEI Zi-xiong,YANG Zi-bo,ZHAI Qi-yi,LIAO Wei-ming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-134X.2009.06.004

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate and compare the results of individual revision prosthesis systems performed in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis.Methods From 1994 to 2000,71 revision total knee arthroplasties had been performed in Tampere University Hospital on 69 patients (56 female,16 male,2 bilateral) using the TC Ⅲ system.16 knees were affected by inflammatory arthritis and 55 by osteoarthritis.The average interval between revision and the first arthroplasty were 6.8 years.Patients were followed-up for 5.9 (3.0~10.2) years,using KSS as the reference.Re-revision,amputation and death were as the endpoint.Results At 1 year after revision and at final follow-up,the total Knee Society knee score,function score and range of motion had improved (P<0.001) with no differences between osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis.No knee had definite component loosening,although 23 knees had asymptomatic radiolucent lines.Complications comprised 4 infections,1 patellar pain syndrome and 1 rupture of the patellar tendon.Using re-revision of the prosthesis as the endpoint,5-year survival was 95% and 8-year survival was 94%.Datas in patients of osteoarthritis were better than inflammatory arthritis at the final follow-up,however,there were no statistical difference between these two groups.Conclusions Although inflammatory arthritis may cause ligamentous laxity,propensity to develop infections,bone destruction and poor general health,patients with inflammatory arthritis had results similar to those with osteoarthritis.