Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

ADRC PID Attitude Control of a Hypersonic Flight Vehicle

Attitude Control of Hypersonic Vehicle Based on Optimized ADRC

Improved 2-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control for PMSM

Active Disturbance Rejection Attitude Control for Hypersonic Vehicle Based on Intelligent Stochastic Robust Optimization Method

Finite-time Decoupling Direct Control for Hypersonic Reentry Vehicle with Multiple Disturbances Via Second-Order ADRC

Reentry Attitude Control of Hypersonic Vehicle based on Sliding Mode Active Disturbance Rejection

Robust adaptive dynamic programming based attitude tracking control for hypersonic vehicle

Attitude Control of Hypersonic Vehicle based on Reinforcement Learning

LADRC-based Attitude Decoupling Control for Helicopter and Parameters Tuning

Application of PID Controller to 2D Differential Geometric Guidance and Control Problem

Online policy iteration ADP-based attitude-tracking control for hypersonic vehicles

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Trajectory-tracking Hybrid Controller Based on ADRC and Adaptive Control Forunmanned Helicopters

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

Research on Aircraft Attitude Control Method Based on Linear Active Disturbance Rejection

An Application of Fuzzy PID Algorithm on Unmanned Helicopter Attitude Control

Fractional-order proportional-integral-derivative linear active disturbance rejection control design and parameter optimization for hypersonic vehicles with actuator faults

ADP-Based Attitude-Tracking Control With Prescribed Performance for Hypersonic Vehicles

Attitude optimization control of hypersonic flight vehicle considering partially unknown control direction

High-Performance Attitude Control Design of Supersonic Tailless Aircraft: A Cascaded Disturbance Rejection Approach

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Based on Feedforward Inverse System for Turbofan Engines