Sustainable Transition and Extended Producer Responsibility

TONG Xin,YAN Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.08.008

2012-01-01

Abstract:This paper reviews the status and trends of Extended Producer Responsibility worldwide with the framework of multi-level perspective of transition theory.We compare the innovation-oriented regime design advocated by EPR theorists and the cost-efficiency analysis on EPR policies in practice,and point out that the conflict between them is whether the radical sustainable transformation should be treated as the basic policy objectives of EPR.The conflict comes from the difficulty in observing and measuring the impacts of EPR program on technological change.Thus,it leads to divergence in policy improvements for EPR practice.The former insists that EPR system should be based on the principle of individual responsibility to encourage the producers to redesign their products,as well as to promote the transition of production and consumption patterns.The later emphasizes on simplifying management and regulation under the existing regulatory framework,and improving the recycling infrastructure and its efficiency.This divergence does not only affect the evolution of the EPR system of developed countries,but also the transplantation and construction of EPR system in developing countries.In conclusion,we propose a framework to study the evolution of Chinese WEEE management system with three levels of observation,including: ① the technological choices at firm level,② the dynamics in supply chain governance,and ③ transformation of recycling sector at large.