Abstract:May police use deception during interrogation? In the United States, the judicial answer to that question has often been a resounding “yes.” The literature suggests four possible objections to this position. The first is empirically-based: deception is simply not necessary to get confessions. The other three objections assume that, in some cases, deception is necessary, but posit that, nonetheless, it must still be prohibited in all or many cases. Objection number two is that lying to suspects undermines the suspect’s dignity and therefore ought to banned completely. The third objection is that, even if the dignity concern can be overcome, deception is often impermissibly coercive. The fourth objection is that, separate and apart from concerns about dignity, even non-coercive trickery ought to be prohibited when it constitutes fraud, which is inherently immoral and perhaps a crime. This chapter, which elaborates on my earlier work on this subject, concludes that, while all of these objections have some merit, some types of interrogation trickery are justified. Specifically, interrogation deception should be permitted if: (1) a judge has determined there is probable cause to believe the person interrogated has committed a crime and that interrogation is necessary to help solve that crime; (2) the police have been unable to obtain a confession through non-deceptive questioning; (3) the police do not engage in negotiation techniques (unless a defense attorney is present), or in fraudulent techniques that verge on criminal actions; and (4) police ensure that they refrain as much as possible from feeding the suspect facts that only the perpetrator would know, so that the reliability of any confession produced can be corroborated.

The Legitimate Interrogation: in Perspective of Human Rights Protection

The Restatement of Investigative Interrogation in Our Country under the Background of the New Criminal Procedure Law

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

Legalization of Interrogation and Examination

Studies of the Lawyer Presence Right in the Investigation and Interrogation Procedure in China

On Legislative Reform and Perfection of Police Interrogation

My Viewpoint of the Reticent Right

How to Ensure the Human Rights During Judicial Investigation to File A Criminal Case

Verbal Confession and Obtain Evidence by Torture

To Establish the Counsel-Present System in Interrogating Suspects

The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation

Police Interrogation from a Social Psychology Perspective

"You have the right to remain silent, so why are you talking?" : interrogation rights, decision making, and the availability heuristic

On Curbing Inquisition by Torture from Both Inside and Outside

Investigation Conducts and Dignity

Collocation and Restriction of Investigating Powers

Criminal Interrogation and the Right to Remain Silent — A Study of the Hong Kong Customs Service

A Study on Countermeasures of Protection of Human Rights in Doubtful Case

Reflections on the Transformation of the Duty crime Investigation Mode in the New Situation

Presumption Rules on Compulsory Interrogation Recording

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law