Abstract:Developing countries, particularly the BRIC countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, should accommodate their national systems of innovation to the worldwide intellectual property (IP) regime emerging after the adoption of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in a way that maximizes global economic welfare in the foreseeable future. As many developed countries' experience demonstrates, badly configured, over-protectionist IP regimes stifle innovation by making inputs to future innovation too costly and too cumbersome to sustain over time. More carefully considered IP regimes, however, are an important way to protect innovative small- and medium-sized firms from predatory, larger competitors. The challenge is for emerging economies to capture the benefits of IP without importing the serious problems that developed countries have themselves failed to solve. Emerging economies can attain this balance by pursuing a policy of counter-harmonization in which they take advantage of existing exemptions in international agreements governing IP to establish regional, local, and international practices that promote more innovative, flexible uses of IP. Such practices include a research exemption for experimental uses of IP, government imposed nonexclusive licensing, anti-blocking provisions, an essential facilities doctrine, and compulsory licenses. Additional tools include an ex ante regime of compensatory liability rules for small scale innovation and sensible exceptions, particularly for science as well as general fair use provisions, to the exclusive rights of domestic copyright laws. Emerging economies will have to overcome strong economic pressure to accept more restrictive IP regimes as part of free trade agreements as well as a lack of technical expertise and internal government coordination. However, emerging economies have already accrued enough experience to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of various IP schemes and their own ability to tailor IP to local needs. Developing countries will need to take advantage of that experience and defend innovative practices at international dispute resolution forums. Through creative, determined efforts, the developing countries can avoid other countries' IP excesses while establishing the kind of IP norms that address the real conditions of creativity and innovation in today's digitally empowered universe of scientific discourse.

New Strategies Adopted for Trade Negotiations of International Intellectual Properties

The Analysis of Intellectual Property Strategy Based on Current Capacity in China

Integrating China's Intellectual Property Policies and Development Strategies

Civil Right Socialization for the Legislation Value Tropism of Intellectual Property

Key Issues and Benchmark of China's Intellectual Property Rights Protection under TRIPS Agreement

On Reform of Chinese IP System under the WTO Laws

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: WILL THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES LEAD OR FOLLOW?

Navigating intellectual property challenges in China: Insights from RCEP and domestic factors

Trips Agreement and Enforcement of the Intellectual Property Rights in China

TRIPS and Developing Countries

The International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Challenges China is Confronted With

Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Sino-U.S.Bilateral Trade Issues

Analysis of North-South's Disputes on Intellectual Property Rights and China's IPR Protection

TRIPS-plus and Access to Medicines in China.

WTO and Countermeasure on Protection of National Intellectual Property

Nominal Level and Actual Strength of China's Intellectual Property Protection (IPP) under the TRIPS Agreement

The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: the Core Strategy for Global Development of Traditional Chinese Medical Industry in the 21st Century

WIPO initiative of transforming traditional resources and sharing rights: An evolutionary game analysis and a Chinese context

Reflection and Improvement of China's Early Warning Mechanism of Intellectual Property

Development Strategy of the Plant Variety Protection in China

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries