Abstract:PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of controversial governance practices on media coverage under a specific context. Based on the attribution theory, this study develops a theoretical framework to explore how antecedent factors can influence attribution process under a particular cultural context.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents a behavioral view of the media and corporate governance to demonstrate how media attributes different reasons for the same controversial governance practice in Chinese-specific context. Using 1,198 non-state-owned listed company observations in China as the study sample, cross-section data are used to build a multiple linear regression mode to test hypotheses.FindingsThe analysis indicates that the media imposes fewer penalties on founder-CEO firms than on non-founder-CEO firms for engaging in controversial governance practices, such as CEO compensation. CEO tenure negatively moderates the effect of CEO compensation on negative media coverage in non-founder-CEO firms. The positive media bias evidence for founder-CEO firms exists only when the firm is better performed.Social implicationsThis study’s contribution to the governance literature starts with its logical reasoning of basic assumptions in the agency theory, and that media penalty will arise when managers impose actions that against interests of shareholders or other stakeholders. This study shows that the rule is not always true. The findings also bridge the connection of governance literature and reputation literature to better explain how media can act as a social arbitration role.Originality/valueThis study provides insights into how belief and information of reputational evaluators affect attribution consequences on controversial governance practices. Moreover, this study looks beyond the internal elements and focuses on China’s traditional cultural context as well. Specifically, the authors concentrate on the attribution process by showing the importance of evaluators’ framing tendency with regard to controversial practices. The results extend the knowledge about how conformity makes media coverage shows a bias effect on interactions during the evaluation process.

Media Coverage,Government Governance and Auditor Switch

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Media Coverage, Unexplained Audit Fees and the Company's Earnings Management

A Media Coverage Perspective Study of the Difference in Earnings Management Activities of Listed Companies——A New Way to Govern Earnings Management

Auditing, Financial Distress and Auditor Switching of Listed Companies: An Empirical Research Based on Data from 2000 to 2003

Study on Governance Effect and Mechanism of Media Attention

The External Governance Effect of Government Auditing:Evidence from Firms' Stock Price Crash Risk

The Corporate Governance Role of Media:Empirical Evidence from China

Earnings Management of the Listed Companies and Auditor Change: Empirical Evidence from China

Media coverage and financial restatements: evidence from China

Slap or Clap? Impact of Controversial Governance Practice on Media Coverage

Research on the Influence Mechanism of Media Supervision on Audit Fees

Government Control and Auditor Choice

Audit Fees, Auditor Switching and Audit Opinion Shopping:Test for Interaction Effect Based on Evidences of Chinese Stock Market

Political connections, auditor choice and corporate accounting transparency: evidence from private sector firms in China

Auditor Changes and Management's Issuance of Earnings Forecasts

Impact of Auditor Turnover on Stock Price Crash Risk: Insights from China's Capital Market