Comparison of visual rating scales for white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging

ZHANG Qiu-Juan,YANG Jun-Le,GUO You-Min,YAO Xiao-Xin,XU Min,ZHANG Jing,BAI Zhi-Lan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-2790.2008.03.024
2008-01-01
Abstract:AIM:To compare 7 widely used rating scales for white matter lesions(WMLs)on MRI,to assess the correlations among the scales and the interrater agreement for each scale,and to calculate the conversion coefficients of the score between dif-ferent scales.METHODS:We selected randomly 50 patients with various degrees of WMLs on T2-FLAIR imaging.The WMLs were scored by two trained raters using 7 MRI rating scales for WMLs.Spearman rank correlation,Kappa test and regression analysis were applied.RESULTS:A high correlation was observed among the 7 scales(correlation coefficients ranging from 0.579 to 0.917,P<0.05).Apart from the scale of Schelten(modilified)and Ylikoski,other rating scales demonstrated better interrater agreement(κ>0.585).Using regression analysis,we determined numeric parameters to transform the score of 1 scale to the corresponding score for each of the remaining scales,except for the scale of Aharon-Peretz J and De Groot JC.The predictive values of these conversions R2 ranged from 0.5856 to 0.8892.CONCLUSION:Our data demonstrates a high correlation among the considered visual rating scales for WMLs and a best interrater agreement for the scale of Aharon-Peretz J.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?