Comparison of Disinfection Effects of Three Methods to Legionella,Biofilm and Aamoebae Protozoa in Water Supply System

Zhou ZhaoYan,Hu BiJie,Yu LingLing,Tao LiLi,Gao Xiaodong,Huang ShengLei
2010-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential of LEP growth in water supply system,to construct a pilot-scale water re-circulation system allowing the simulation and compare the effects of different disinfection treatments to LEP,Amoebae and biofilm.METHODS A pilot-scale system consisted of four PPR re-circulation loops and dead legs system.During the study,each of three loops received continuous application of one of the following disinfection treatments for 75 days: copper-sliver ionization(0.4/0.04 mg/L),chlorine dioxide(0.5 mg/L) and thermal eradication(maintained over 55 ℃).The fourth loop was used as a control.Culture techniques,fluorescent in situ hybridization,confocal laser scanning microscopy after viability staining with the LIVE/DEAD kit were used for planktonic and biofilm flora monitoring.RESULTS Before starting the treatments,the system was highly contaminated with LEP in water(3.4×103/ml) and biofilm(2.4×104/cm2).In the water and the biofilm of the loops,Chlorine dioxide and thermal eradication were more effective in reducing the microbial flora,including LEP.Heterotrophic bacteria were still highly detectable after copper-silver ionization application.Copper-silver did not eradicate the biofilm.Only chlorine dioxide led to detectable effects in the dead leg.However,after interruptting the treatments,L.pneumophila quickly recovered their initial levels in chlorine dioxide case.CONCLUSIONS Thermal eradication,applied as a continuous treatment,is identified in this study as the most efficient for controlling LEP,once the LEP rooted in circumstance,it is practically impossible to eradicate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?