The Intra-metropolitan Location of R&D-Intensive Manufacturing in Beijing and Shanghai
Yang Fan,Du Debin,Duan Dezhong,Lin Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.04.002
2017-01-01
Abstract:Beijing and Shanghai are major sci-tech innovation hub cities in China. Based on urban ZIP code spa-tial database and R&D-intensive manufacturing firm data, this article explores the spatial distribution and influ-ence factors of R&D-intensive manufacturing industry by using ArcGIS and Stata, and then reveals the differ-ence of the location distribution model of R&D-intensive manufacturing industry between Beijing and Shang-hai. The results show that Beijing R&D-intensive manufacturing industry tended to distribute mainly in the northwest inside the Sixth Ring and displayed the centralized pattern of Zhongguancun-Changping, Fengtai, Yi-zhuang and Wangjing-Jiuxianqiao as spatial aggregated hot zones, while Shanghai R&D-intensive manufactur-ing industry was characterized by the coexistence of concentration and diffusion, distributing in each direction inside the suburban loop line and taking Caohejing, Zhangjiang, Jinqiao, Meilong and Wujiaochang as spatial aggregated hot zones. Meanwhile, both Beijing and Shanghai R&D-intensive manufacturing industry had sig-nificant agglomeration effects, the difference is that Beijing took Zhongguancun-Shangdi as the single agglom-erate center, while Shanghai took Caohejing and Zhangjiang as the twin symbiotic agglomeration pattern. The spatial distribution of different industrial types was unanimous with the general characteristics, but showing a certain specific. The high-technology firms were mostly located in the main urban areas, and their hotspots dis-tribution shrunk back to the main urban areas and suburbs. Conversely, the other traditional manufacturing firms which also belong to R&D-intensive manufacturing industry were scattered in the outskirts, with the hot-spots stretched out to the remote suburbs. Development zone, transportation accessibility and path dependence all had an important impact on the choice of location of firms in Beijing and Shanghai, and in addition the loca-tion of Shanghai firms was also affected by the positive impact of suburbanization and the location of research institutions and the old industrial areas, while suburbanization have negative impacts on the location of Beijing firms. As a result, the R&D-intensive manufacturing industry distribution in Beijing was a compact-central model with the development zone as the single industrial spatial carrier, while in Shanghai was a discrete-sub-urbanize model with development zones, research institutes and old industrial areas as multiple industrial space carriers. This study just used cross-sectional data without a time-series, so it could not analyze the evolu-tion trend of the R&D-intensive manufacturing industry distribution and its formation mechanism. Also, the da-ta possibly had survivorship bias. More importantly, the difference of economic and social benefits between different R&D-intensive manufacturing industry spatial distribution patterns needs to be discussed further.