Abstract:Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover Bids of EU was finally approved by the European Parliament and the Council of European Union,with the purposes of creating an integrated European capital market,establishing guidelines for the takeovers happening in the boundaries of the EU and legal certainty in the case of cross-border takeovers,as well as ensuring a minimum and adequate level of legal protection for stakeholders,especially minority shareholders,related to takeover bids. Divergence concerning takeover defensive measures has existed among EU Member States for decades.In order to create a level playing field for European cross-border takeovers,High Level Group of Company Law Experts came forward with recommendations on this issue raised by the European Parliament and presented two principles involving"shareholder decision- making"and"proportionality between risk bearing and control".On the basis of the principles,the board of directors of a target company shall keep neutral when facing a takeover and shareholder approval must be obtained before it can take any action which may frustrate a bid;any mechanism against the principle of"proportionality between risk bearing and control",e.g.,any defense to takeovers put in place by a target company before a bid occurs that has the effects of restrictions on transfers of shares or limitations on voting rights,shall lose its effect temporarily or permanently.Meanwhile,the Directive provides that EU Member States can choose whether or not to impose the above principles on companies registered within their territories.The Directive further stipulates that disclosure should be made in a company's annual report about its capital or control structures, and defensive mechanisms. The article introduces the history of the Directive aiming at creating a level playing field for takeovers in EU,expatiates on the rules concerning the obligations of the board of a offeree company,the principles of Breakthrough, Optional arrangements and Information disclosure.

The Law Application of Transnational Listed Corporation Acquisition

How Does Foreign Acquirers’ ESG Misbehaviour Exposure Affect the Completion of Cross‐Border Acquisitions?

Antitrust control of mergers and acquisitions: a case study of China

Study on Securities Laws and Regulations in the Field of Mergers and Acquisitions of Multinational Enterprises in China

Anti-takeover Measures under the New EU Company Law Directive

Local Versus Global: Corporate Governance Practices in Chinese Domestic and Overseas Companies

Experience of Internationalization of Chinese Corporate Law and Corporate Governance: How to Make the Hybrid of Civil Law and Common Law Work?

Elementary Regulation and Review on China's M&A Laws and Regulations

An Analysis of the Influence of Chinese Enterprises' Transnational Leveraged Buyouts

Do Market Value Market-Based Governance? Case of Cross-Border Acquisitions by Chinese Firms

Corporate Governance Reforms and Cross-Border Acquisitions

Hostile Takeover and Anti-takeover of Chinese Listed Companies Seen from the Case of Shengli Stock's Anti-takeover

Investor Protection and Cross-Border Acquisitions by Chinese Listed Firms: the Moderating Role of Institutional Shareholders

Tighter Control on Foreign Acquisitions in China? – The XCMG Case

Examining the Cross-Border Acquisition Strategy of Chinese Companies

Compelling Offer Acquisition: Institutional Development, Assessment and Enforcement --in the View of Economical Law

Governmental governance of host countries and cross-border merger and acquisition performance: Evidence from listed enterprises in China

From the Corporation Law in Statutes to the Corporation Law in Practice

Examining the Cross-Border Acquisition Strategy of Chinese Companies The Moderating Roles of State Ownership and Institutional Transition

Legal Environment,Corporate Governance and Expropriation:Evidence from the Comparison of Chinese and U.S.Stock Markets

On Good Faith Duty of the Controlling Shareholder of Listed Company