Diagnostic capability of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in malignant tumors compared with positron emission tomography CT
王小艺,吴宁,赵燕风,欧阳汉,张瑾,刘莉,张雯杰,郑容,梁颖
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.06.015
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic capability of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WBDWI) with 1.5 T MR scanner in malignant lesions and compare it with 18F-FDG PETCT.Methods Thirty-five patients with pathologically proved malignant tumors were enrolled in this study.All patients underwent both WBDWI and PET-CT,and were followed up for more than 6 months.The final diagnosis was determined based on the results of pathology and clinical follow-up.The value of ADC and SUVm~ of each lesion were measured.The ROC curve,sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the two methods were compared.Kappa analyses were used to compare the diagnostic consistency between both methods.Areas under the curve were compared by Hanley & McNeil.Categorical variables were tested with the Chi-square test or McNemar test.Results The area under the ROC curve of WBDWI,PET-CT,eADC,and SUVmax were 0.952,0.970,0.844 and 0.858,respectively.There was no significant statistical difference between WBDWI and PET-CT,eADC and SUVmax (Z =2.153,1.195,P > 0.05),but Az (WBDWI) was significantly larger than Az(SUVmax) (Z =7.456,P < 0.01),Az (PET-CT) was significantly larger than Az (SUV) (Z =6.821,P < 0.01).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were 86.6%,95.3% and 89.5% in WBDWI,and 94.4%,94.3% and 94.3% in PET-CT.Kappa value of the diagnostic consistency between WBDWI and PET-CT was 0.745.Conclusions WBDWI had a high sensitivity,specificity and accuracy in detecting malignant lesions,and a substantial consistency with PET-CT,which could provide an appropriate choice for radiation-sensitive population.