Abstract:Purpose The main purpose of this paper is to measure the status and quality of library and information science (LIS) open-access (OA) journals in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Design/methodology/approach The study selected 86 source journals of LIS in the SSCI as a sample and measured their status of open access. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to analyze 36 OA journals of 86 source journals, especially their production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Findings The results indicate that OA journals have become an increasingly important part of LIS journals. Production capability, academic influence and network communication ability are important factors affecting the quality of OA journals. These three evaluation indicators of LIS OA journals are high, but many still have room for improvement. Research limitations/implications As the paper is limited by collecting data, the indicators of OA journals’ quality are not all-around. So, they cannot reflect the quality of LIS OA journals. In the selection of the evaluation method, the evaluation results are limited because only one AHP method is used. Practical implications The research on evaluation of OA journals can help library and scientific research personnel use OA journals effectively. Identifying key factors on evaluation can help researchers to construct OA journals better. Social implications The research on OA journals’ quality can also promote the study on OA process in academic circles and promote the communication, development and utilization of academic information. Such research can also enrich the theory of OA, and provide some new perspectives for the study of journals’ evaluation. Originality/value This paper measures the quality of LIS OA journals by analyzing production capability, academic influence and network communication ability. Rather than the traditional research methods, the focus of this study is on the value of the Web as a source of impact indices. It contributes to the scholarly impact measurements of OA journals.

On the Quality Index of Basic Research Achievement in Social Sciences——Taking Law for Example

RESEARCH ON INDEX SYSTEM OF CREDIT EVALUATING OF ENTERPRISES AND EVALUATING METHODS

Openness and Knowledge Sharing of Economics,Sociology,Law and Politics:A Comparative Study on Citations of Chinese Social Science Journals

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Statistical Model of Scientific Research Evaluation

Evaluation index system for academic papers of humanities and social sciences

Research on the Quality-and-Innovation-oriented Academic Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences

Research on the Quality and Quantity of Social Scientific Publication:——A Case Study: 2001 Nobel Laureate Economist George A. Akerlof

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Research on the Basic Index Frame of Evaluating Discipline Innovation Capability of Humanities and Social Sciences

The Comparison of the Characteristics of Higher Education's Quality Evaluation and the Evaluation Mechanism of Social Agency Between China and Japan

On Building Evaluation System of Humanities and Social Sciences

Analysis Of Academic Evaluation Indicators Based On Citation Quality

Academic Internationalization and Chinese Social Sciences Evaluation System:Taking SSCI Indicator as an Example

Quality-structure index: A new metric to measure scientific journal influence

Research on the Information Quality Measurement of Judicial Documents.

ON THE EVALUATION MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND THEIR GAUGING SYSTEM IN COLLEGES/DEPARTMENTS OF UNIVERSITIES

A Study of the Quality Assessment of Online Sci-tech Research Papers

The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Evaluation on the development of philosophical social science