Clinical Analysis of 102 Cases of Renal Leiomyolipomas
辛宇鹏,高锐,卢一平,魏强,李响,王佳,陈宗福,石明,范天勇,沈宏,李虹,杨宇如
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0179.2005.03.019
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the diagnosis and treatment of renal leiomyolipoma.Methods:Clinical data of 102 cases of renal leiomyolipoma were reviewed retrospectively.The cases were divided in 3 groups based on the diameter of the tumor;Group A(4cm),Group B(≥4~≤8cm)and Group C(8cm).Results:In Group A,81%(17/21)of the patients were asymtomatic,3 patients had undergone enucleation of the lesion,the others were followed up without surgical intervention;in Groups B,79%(50/63)had clinical complaints and of the 63 cases,tumor enucleation was done in 44,partial nephrectomy in 8,nephrectomy in 4,radical nephrectomy in 2 and regular follow-up in 5 and in Group C,88%(16/18)of the patients were symptomatic,acquired surgical operation including tumor enucleation was done in 4,partial nephrectomy in 6,radical nephrectomy in 2,selective emergency arterial embolization followed by nephrectomy in 1,and nephrectomy in 6 of which dislodged tumor embolus from infenor vena cavd.All cases were confirmed by pathology after operation.Conclusion:The patients with RAML4cm could likely to be asymtomatic and could be observed from follow-up.With RAML≥4cm,surgery was ecessary.Nephron-sparing surgery(NSS)was the optimal choice.