Choose of sugical intervention for renal leiomyolipomas with different diameter

XIN Yupeng,GAO Rui,LU Yiping,WEI Qiang,WANG Jia,SHI Ming,FAN Tianyong,SHEN Hong,LI Hong,YANG Yuru
2006-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the diagnosis and treatment of renal leiomyolipoma.Methods:Clinical data of 102 cases of renal leiomyolipoma were reviewed retrospectively. The cases were divided in 3 groups based on the size of single largest tumor: Group A(<4 cm), Groups B(4~≤8 cm), Groups C(>8 cm). In Group A, 81%(17/21) of the patients were asymtomatic, regular followed up was primary. In Groups B, 79%(50/63) had clinical complaints. Of the 63 cases, Nephron-sparing surgery was done in 52, nephrectomy in 4, radical nephrectomy in 2, regular follow-up in 5. In Group C, 88%(16/18) of the patients were symptomatic, all patients acquired surgical operation including Nephron-sparing surgery was done in 10, radical nephrectomy in 2, selective emergency arterial embolization followed by nephrectomy in 1, nephrectomy in 6 of which dislodged tumor embolus from postcava in 1.Results:All cases were confirmed renal leiomyolipomas by pathology after operation.Conclusions:The patients with RAML<4 cm are likely to be asymtomatic and should be observed, With RAML≥4 cm, surgery is ecessary. Nephron-sparing surgery(NSS) is optimum choice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?