Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Do Calendar Effects Still Exist In The Chinese Stock Markets?

The Calendar Effects on China's Stock Market Based on Rolling Sample Tests

Empirical Evidence Of Disappearing Day-Of-The-Week Effect In Chinese Stock Market

Relativity Between China Stock Market and its Economic Growth Based on VAR

Empirical Studies of Weekend Effects' Disappearance in Chinese Security Markets

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of Chinese stock returns?

Forecasting Stock Volatility Using Time-Distance Weighting Fundamental’s Shocks

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

Has Chinese Stock Market Become Efficient? Evidence From A New Approach

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Lunar calendar effect: evidence of the Chinese Farmer's Calendar on the equity markets in East Asia

Solar Term Anomaly in China Stock Market: Evidence from Shanghai Index

Utilizing the GARCH Model for Analysis and Prediction of Stock Market Trends

Asymmetric Effect in Chinese Stock Market Based on Rolling Sample Tests

An Empirical Study on Overnight Effect and Noon Effect in China Stock Market

The Day‐of‐the‐month Effect and the Performance of the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy: Evidence from China

Empirical Study of Spring Festival Effect in Chinese Stock Market

The Effectiveness of Regulatory Policy Changes on the Volatility Dynamics of the Chinese Stock Markets

Volatility analysis based on GARCH-type models: Evidence from the Chinese stock market

Inference for calendar effects in microstructure noise