Abstract:Many writings emphasize the importance of Chinese culture to the 1989 Beijing Student Movement. Comparing the 1989 movement to the May 4th movement of 1919 and to the December 9th movement of 1935-36, this study finds the rhetoric and activity patterns of the 1989 movement to be actually more traditional than those of its forerunners. This is quite a paradox, considering the scale of social change in China during the 20th century. This article argues that the 1989 movement's traditionalist outlook can be explained by three structural conditions, all involving state-society relations. In comparison with the states of the earlier movements, the state during the 1980s had a higher capacity for repression. To avoid immediate repression, students tended to hide their real demands and goals behind safer and culturally congenial forms of action. Second, China in the 1980s had comparatively weaker independent civil organizations. Hence, the movement was poorly organized, and competing activities frequently occurred in the same time and location. What determined the efficacy of these activities then were less the actors' intentions than the perception of those who were observing the movement. This study argues that people's acceptance of particular movement activities is shaped by their perception of state legitimation. During the 1980s, most Chinese saw that the state's legitimacy lay in its moral performance, close to what was in traditional China. Therefore, people were more receptive to culturally and morally charged movement activities. This furthered the domination of traditionalism during the 1989 movement.

On the Change in Masses Demonstration and Its Policy Implications

Consent to Contend: the Power of the Masses in China's Local Elite Bargain

Riding on the power of the masses? How different modes of mass mobilization shape local elite bargaining in China

Some Thoughts on Mass Collective Actions in Contemporary China

Repression Backfires: tactical radicalization and protest spectacle in rural China

Mass Movements and Rural Governance in Communist China: 1945–1976

State Capacity and Cadre Mobilization in China: The Elasticity of Policy Implementation

The Win-Win Result:A New Perspective to Regulating Mass Events in Transitional China

How Mass Political Attitudes Affect Democratization: Exploring The Facilitating Role Critical Democrats Play In The Process

Preventing Protest One Person at a Time: Psychological Coercion and Relational Repression in China*

Multi-channelled Forceful Intervention, Frames and Protest Success—a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Study of 40 Anti-Demolition Protests in China

Peace Versus Violence——On the Duality in the Means of Protest for Anti-globalization Movement

Dual Mediation and Success of Environmental Protests in China: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 10 Cases

Less than Expected? How Media Cover Demonstration Turnout

Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters

Mass Incidents in Modern China: Change of Image and Reconstruction of Classification Framework

State‐Society Relations and the Discourses and Activities of the 1989 Beijing Student Movement

From "Not In My Back Yard" to policy advocacy: The co-empowerment model between media and protests in China

Adaptive Social Mobilization in Grassroots Policy Implementation: Administrative Control and Multiple Participation

Societies of Senior Citizens and Popular Protest in Rural Zhejiang

Emotional Mobilization of Chinese Veterans: Collective Activism, Flexible Governance and Dispute Resolution