Case Selection in Public Management Research: Problems and Solutions
David M. Konisky,Christopher Reenock,D. M. Konisky,C. Reenock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus051
IF: 6.16
2012-11-15
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Abstract:Case selection is ubiquitous in public management research. Rarely do scholars have access to entire populations of interest. Yet, the manner by which scholars select samples to conduct their analyses can have profound consequences on their ability both to draw valid causal inferences and to estimate accurate relationships. In this article, we review the basic threats to inference that are likely to emerge in the presence of non-random case selection, with specific attention to their manifestation in empirical public management research. The article first reviews the threats to causal inference presented by case selection, focusing on their implications for internal and external validity. We then summarize a standard set of solutions to address potential problems for empirical models caused by non-random case selection. As part of this discussion, we review recent articles published in this journal to illustrate the prevalence of selection issues in contemporary public management studies, and then illustrate several techniques that have been developed to overcome specific problems to show their utility for public management research. 《公共管理研究中的案例分析方法:问题及即决方案》 作者:大卫M. 柯尼斯基 ,克里斯朵夫·雷诺克 案例分析的方法在公共管理 (public management) 研究中广为应用。学者们通常很难收集与研究命题相关的所有案例数据,因此他们选择一些案例用以实证分析。然而,选择案例的过程和方法都会极大的影响研究结果。 具体而言,案例的选择会直接影响对于因果关系的合理推论和对 (变量之间) 关系的准确计量。在本文中,我们综述了公共管理学的实证研究中用使用非随机性样本选择 (non-random case selection) 对合理推论因果关系的影响。首先,我们具体讨论 (非随机)案例选择如何影响研究的内在和外在效度(internal and external validity)。其次,我们归纳总结了一系列关于非随机性样本选择潜在问题的解决方案。在这一部分的讨论中,我们综述了发表在本期刊中的论文,并用此来例举在公共管理研究中样本选择偏差的问题。 最后我们讨论了一些相关的解决方法及其在公共管理研究用的应用。
public administration,political science