Abstract:The purposes of this paper are sixfold. First, any micromechanics model for predicting elastic property (stiffness) of a composite is applicable to a reasonable prediction of a composite strength, provided that the homogenized internal stresses in the matrix are converted into true values. The conversion for all of the stress components free of biaxially transverse loads is presented in the paper. Second, the predictability of 12 well-known micromechanics models for stiffness and strength of a unidirectional composite is assessed against the measured data of all of the nine unidirectional composites used in three world-wide failure exercises. An accuracy ranking is made accordingly. Third, it is demonstrated that the smallest fiber volume in a representative volume element for a finite element approach plays a more dominant role than other issues such as a random fiber array to achieve the highest simulation accuracy. This feature has been largely ignored in the current literature. Fourth, a consistency of a micromechanics model in calculating the internal stresses in the fiber and matrix of the composite is an issue that should be taken into account. Among the 12 models considered, only Bridging Model is consistent. A non-consistency implies that a full three-dimensional approach should be used to predict an effective property of the composite even though it is subjected to a uniaxial load. Fifth, an effective method to detect an interface debonding between the fiber and matrix subjected to an arbitrary load is presented in the paper. Only a transverse tensile strength of the composite, in addition to the original fiber and matrix properties, is needed. Whereas essentially any load can cause the interface to debond earlier before a composite failure, only a transverse tensile load carrying capacity of the composite is influenced significantly by the debonding. Specifically, an interface debonding has insignificant effect on a shear strength of the composite. Sixth, a fiber misalignment-induced kink band failure is analyzed by virtue of the original fiber and matrix properties, and a longitudinal compressive strength is predicted micromechanically.

Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model

Micromechanical Analysis Of Nonlinear Response On Fibrous Composite

Simulation Of Ultimate Strength Of Fiber-Reinforced Composites By Means Of Bridging Micromechanics Model

On micromechanics approach to stiffness and strength of unidirectional composites

The Mechanical Properties Of Composites Reinforced With Woven And Braided Fabrics

Micromechanical modeling of fatigue strength of unidirectional fibrous composites

Correlation of the bridging model predictions of the biaxial failure strengths of fibrous laminates with experiments

Modeling inelastic and strength properties of textile laminates: a unified approach

Simulation of Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials Mold Filling Process and Mechanical Properties Analysis

Effective Elastic Properties of Transversely Isotropic Matrix Based Composites

Micromechanical modeling of mechanical properties of composite materials

A New Approach to A Bridging Tensor

A Micromechanical Model for Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials

Micromechanical Prediction of Elastic-Plastic Behavior of a Short Fiber or Particle Reinforced Composite

Stiffness Prediction of Short Fiber Reinforced Composites

Constitutive Relation, Deformation, Failure and Strength of Composites Reinforced with Continuous/short Fibers or Particles

Fatigue Life Prediction of A Woven Fabric Composite Subjected to Biaxial Cyclic Loads

A simplified micromechanical model for predicting effective mechanical behaviors of continuous bidirectional-fiber-reinforced composites

Prediction of three-dimensional elastic behavior of filament-wound composites based on the bridging model

Predicting strength of fibrous laminates under triaxial loads only upon independently measured constituent properties

Micromechanical Modeling of the Viscoelastic–viscoplastic Response of Fiber-Reinforced Composites