Abstract:The passive Responsibilism,"nulla poena sine culpa",is a commonly agreed criminal principle and the basic requirement of human rights.Penalty measurement concerns the protection of the human rights of defendants and even the general human rights condition in a country,thus the Point theory of penalty measurement,which is the inevitable conclusion of the passive Responsibilism,should be adopted.According to the Point theory,criminal responsibility determines the toplimit of a punishment.Only under this point can judges consider the necessity of crime prevention.The opinion and its practice of measuring penalty beyond the toplimit decided by responsibility for the necessity of crime prevention or sentencing a heavier punishment under the responsibility—decided penalty (point) for the needs of general prevention not only go against Responsibilism,but also violate defendants' dignity. In fact,synthesis idealism calls for a balance between responsibility—related and prevention —related punishment and judges need to tell which one is influenced by a special plot,because prevention—related plots can be only considered under responsibility—decided penalty (point). The principle of suiting punishment to crime,which is interpreted as heavy punishment fits heavy offense and light punishment fits minor offense,is just for responsibility—decided penalty,not for declaratory penalty.As to declaratory punishment,such principle should be applied asymmetrically. Namely,in accordance with the Point theory,this principle means only that a punishment can not exceed the responsibility—decided toplimit.In this way,although this principle can be interpreted as light punishment fits minor offense,a heavy penalty does not always follow a heavy crime.On the contrary,a light punishment may be sentenced considering minor needs of prevention, even if a heavy crime is accused.To put it bluntly,the principle of suiting punishment to crime permits a sentence under responsibility—decided penalty (point). Neither Current criminal theories guiding discussion on the criterion and method of penalty measurement nor the judicial practice insisting on the normalization of penalty measurement fully consist with Responsibilism.For criminal theory and practice,the highest priority is to carry out Responsibilism in the theory and practice of penalty measurement.

A Research on the possibility of Punishing Participation in Suicide

Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: an Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens

Suicide and Related Offences in the Sense of Criminal Law

Also On the Function of Personal Danger in Chinese Criminal Law——Discuss with Researcher You Wei &Judge Lu Jianhong

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

The Criminal Law's Problem and Value Orientation in the Xiao Zhijun Case—a New Explanationof the Inaction,causal Relation and Indirect Intention

Interaction between physical activity and problematic mobile phone use on suicidality in Chinese college students

Some Issues on the "Objective Punishment Condition"

Analysis on Rational Correction of Application Scope of Voluntary Surrender System in China

On the Sentencing Discretion of Punishment Aimed at Prevention

The Participation of Qualification Offender:from the Perspective of Comparative Law

Analysis on Administrative Levels of Criminalizing Those who Fail to Rescue

Reconsideration of Penalization for a Preparation from the Angle of the Criminal Norms Science

The Judicial Interpretation of Intimate Partner Homicide in China: An Empirical Analysis of Sentencing Practice Between 2016 and 2021

The Dilemma and Breakthrough of General Principle of Punishing Preparatory Crime

Suicide-related crimes in contemporary European criminal laws

Can sports participation be a protective factor against suicide-related outcomes in adolescents: a systematic review

Protection and Punishment: Choice of Criminal Policies Against Juvenile Crimes

The International Criminal Juridical Practice and the Relevant Chinese Policy

A special type of homicide-suicide: A retrospective study of the characteristics of extended suicide

Responsibilism and the Doctrine of Penalty Measurement