Abstract:Spray combustion is encountered in many engineering applications, such as internal combustion engines and gas-turbine aircraft engines. In these systems, the concurrent processes of liquid atomization, droplet evaporation, turbulent dispersion, and combustion interact and strongly affect each other, which makes experimental measurement and high-fidelity simulation challenging. To understand these multi-physics phenomena and their strong coupling interactions, methodology of direct numerical simulation (DNS) is helpful. DNS has been proven to be a powerful tool for exploring fundamentals of single-phase turbulent flows (Moin & Mahesh 1998) and turbulent combustion (Vervisch & Poinsot 1998). Recently, DNS has been applied to study spray combustion (Reveillon & Vervisch 2005; Domingo et al. 2005; Watanabe et al. 2008). Peraa & Reveillon (2007) further applied a two-dimensional compressible solver to explore the spray flame/acoustic interactions. However, all these studies are limited to two-dimensional and simple configurations. Large eddy simulation (LES) has also been extended to study spray combustion of realistic applications (Moin & Apte 2006; Patela et al. 2007). Although consistent results with experimental data have been achieved, using models of gaseous combustion to describe spray flames leads to some modeling issues, as discussed by Baba & Kurose (2008). For example, this approach suggests that combustion can be accurately modeled independent of spray evaporation. However, the combustion process is intricately coupled with the spray evaporation, and combustion models should correctly reflect these interactions. The present study is motivated by the above background. To gain a better understanding of three-dimensional spray flame behavior, as well as evaporation-combustion interactions in a more realistic configuration, direct numerical simulations of n-heptane spray flames in a model swirling combustor have been conducted. The simulations are performed to approach realistic spray combustion as much as possible. Potential insights into swirling spray combustion are presented, and relevant modeling issues are discussed.

Numerical Simulation of Propane-air Swirling Diffuse Combustion from Annular Fuel Inlet

Numerical Simulation of Swirling Diffusion Flame with Central Fuel Inlet

Numerical Simulation and Flame Characteristics Analysis of Non-Premixed Swirling Combustion

Direct Numerical Simulations and Analysis of Three-Dimensional N-Heptane Spray Flames in a Model Swirl Combustor

Numerical Simulation of Propane Turbulent Combustion in a Swirl Combustor

Simulation of turbulent combustion and NO formation in a swirl combustor

Spray flames in an air-heptane swirling combustor

Numerical Simulation of the Gas/Air Mixing Characteristics in Mixers

Comparison Between LES-EBU and RANS-SOM Modeling of Propane-Air Swirling Diffusion Combustion with Annular Fuel Inlet

Numerical Investigation of Swirl-Stabilized Pulverized Coal Flames in Air and Oxy-Fuel Atmospheres by Means of Large Eddy Simulation Coupled with Tabulated Chemistry

Numerical Simulation for Turbulent Combustion in Underwater Vehicle Combustor

Numerical Simulation on Combustion Characteristics of Biofuels with Different Calorific Values

Studies on a Swirling Heptane Spray Flame by Large-Eddy Simulation

Numerical Study of Turbulent Swirling Diffusion Flame Under Lean and Rich Conditions Using Turbulence Realizable k-epsilon Model

Large-Eddy Simulation of Propane-Air Swirling Diffusion Combustion Using SOM Sub-Grid Scale Combustion Model

Numerical and Experimental Assessment of a Novel Multinozzle Burner with CO2 Diluent to Improve the Emissions from a Swirling Flame in a Combustion Chamber

Numerical simulation of ultra-low calorific value gas combustion

Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Flow Process of Slinger Annular Combustor

Direct numerical simulation of three-dimensional swirling n-heptane spray flames

Direct Numerical Simulation and Analysis of a Hydrogen/air Swirling Premixed Flame in a Micro Combustor

Simulation of swirling combustion and NO formation using a USM turbulence-chemistry model☆