Study on the Composition of the Group of County Education Bureaux Directors during the Republic Period (1912—1937)
TIAN Zheng-ping,LIU Chong-min
2006-01-01
Abstract:The directors of county education bureaux in the Republic Period (1912—1937) referred to the head of the education administration at grass-roots level,carrying heavy responsibilities of promoting the reform of traditional education and developing modern education. The actual condition of their work and life had great influence on the grass-roots education. This article analyzes the composition of the group of these directors in terms of selection and appointment,native place and avoidance,qualifications and background,salary and treatment,and experience and tenure. Four main methods used respectively in naming the directors of county education bureaux during the period were election,recommendation,appointment or examination,which underwent an evolutional process from disorder to unification and from permissiveness to strictness. The overwhelming majority of the directors were from the provinces in which they lived and worked-most of them being from the local counties-seldom from other provinces. Their qualifications and background were varied and complicated. Most of them graduated from normal school,while a few were graduates of normal college,the education department of university or abroad. The directorship of county-level education was not so attractive to the better qualified. The director's salary differed greatly from province to province,even in the same province. The low-income directors often had to take a part-time job for survival. The moderate salary failed to ensure high efficiency in terms of grass-roots administration. Normally,most of the directors-to-be had worked for five to seven years as county-level educational supervisor or primary/junior high school teacher,etc.-the official position lower than bureau directorship. Few of them had ever served as secondary school principal. The director's tenure was very short,largely shorter than one year. More than 76% of the directors quit before the expiration of their legal tenure,due to economic,political and some other external factors. The short tenure prevented the directors from performing successfully