Abstract:In this paper we consider strong Nash equilibria, in mixed strategies, for finite games. Any strong Nash equilibrium outcome is Pareto efficient for each coalition. First, we analyze the two--player setting. Our main result, in its simplest form, states that if a game has a strong Nash equilibrium with full support (that is, both players randomize among all pure strategies), then the game is strictly competitive. In order to get our result we use the indifference principle fulfilled by any Nash equilibrium, and the classical KKT conditions (in the vector setting), that are necessary conditions for Pareto efficiency. Our characterization enables us to design a strong-Nash-equilibrium-finding algorithm with complexity in Smoothed-$\mathcal{P}$. So, this problem---that Conitzer and Sandholm [Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T., 2008. New complexity results about Nash equilibria. Games Econ. Behav. 63, 621--641] proved to be computationally hard in the worst case---is generically easy. Hence, although the worst case complexity of finding a strong Nash equilibrium is harder than that of finding a Nash equilibrium, once small perturbations are applied, finding a strong Nash is easier than finding a Nash equilibrium. Next we switch to the setting with more than two players. We demonstrate that a strong Nash equilibrium can exist in which an outcome that is strictly Pareto dominated by a Nash equilibrium occurs with positive probability. Finally, we prove that games that have a strong Nash equilibrium where at least one player puts positive probability on at least two pure strategies are extremely rare: they are of zero measure.

Two Equivalence Results for Two-Person Strict Games.

Game Transformations That Preserve Nash Equilibria or Best-Response Sets

Best-Response dynamics in two-person random games with correlated payoffs

Strong Nash equilibria and mixed strategies

A Robust Characterization of Nash Equilibrium

Best-response dynamics, playing sequences, and convergence to equilibrium in random games

Linear-quadratic two-person differential game: Nash game versus Stackelberg game, local information versus global information

Evaluation and Learning in Two-Player Symmetric Games via Best and Better Responses

On the Equivalence of Evolutionary Stable Strategies

On the equivalence between the minimax theorem and strong duality of conic linear programming

Nash Equilibrium and Axiom of Choice Are Equivalent

New inequalities for probability functions in the two-person red-and-black game

Uniformly strict equilibrium for repeated games with private monitoring and communication

Nash Equilibrium in Games on Graphs with Incomplete Preferences

A general structure theorem for the Nash equilibrium correspondence

A note on simple games with two equivalence classes of players

Analysis and Computation of the Outcomes of Pure Nash Equilibria in Two-Player Extensive-Form Games

The equilibrium properties of obvious strategy profiles in games with many players

A New Game Equivalence and Its Modal Logic.

Nash equilibria of quasisupermodular games

Existence of open-loop equilibria in differential games with impulsive effects suffered by logic choice