Abstract:Empirical legal studies can benefit from the research findings of cultural psychology to understand the fundamental principles of law. Research findings in cultural psychology have shown that Eastern Asian cultures and North American cultures differ significantly in value orientations, moral judgments and cognitive styles. East Asian values emphasize collectivism and North American values emphasize individualism. East Asians moral reasons are centered on the principles of duties and responsibilities whereas North American moral reasons are centered on the principles of autonomy and justice. East Asian cognitive styles tend to be more holistic, focusing on context, backgrounds and relations and the North American cognitive styles tend to be more analytic, focusing on objects, categories and dispositions. Such cultural differences have profound implications in legal understanding and legal practices, as laws are human machinery and are subject to the influence of human values, moralities and cognition. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural legal studies has shown East and West differences in causation inquiry, responsibility judgments, contract formation and mediation practices. Research indicates that East Asian causal reasoning is less likely to make the fundamental attribution error as North Americans do. East Asians’ responsibility judgments, compared with North Americans’, involve more contextual information (such as moral judgments) than the law actually warrants. East Asians’ contract formation may be more based on relational obligations than the North Americans’, which are rule based. The compensation judgments by East Asians appear to be based on the consequence whereas judgments made by North Americans seem to be based on intention judgments. East Asians also prefer mediation in conflict resolutions while North Americans prefer litigation in conflict resolutions. We argue that these differences could influence people’s understanding, construction and use of laws in fundamental ways. As the law attempts to further understand people, and as theorists continue to evaluate how human life and law influence each others, scholars in both psychology and law must challenge themselves to reflect on the law’s substantive and procedural standards being applied in different cultural groups.. We hope our paper can generate enough interests among Chinese psychologists and legal scholars to start the journey towards finding solutions that both considers cultural psychology’s empirical findings and effectuates our legal ideals. The cross-culture empirical legal studies hence not only provide a new paradigm for legal scholarship but also provide theoretical guidance for advancing Chinese legal studies in global stages as well as in resolving international legal disputes between people from China and other countries.

The Analysis of Act of Legal Culture from the Perspective of Jurisprudence

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

Judging the Method of Economic Analysis of Law

Chinese Legal Culture: From Tradition to Modernity

On the Meaning, Context of Legal Culture and Chinese Problem thereof

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

An Analysis of Modernization of Chinese Legal Culture

Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture by American Jurists in the 21st Century:Subject Matter,Methodology and Prospect

An Analysis of “Emotion, Reason and Law” in Chinese Traditional Legal Culture

On the Transformation of Law Culture and Reconstruction of Law Order in the Context of Globalization

Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture by American Jurists in the 21st Century: Subject Matter, Methodology and Prospect

Reflections on Chinese Traditional Legal Culture and its Globalization

Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies

From Abandoning to Respecting: the Relation Between Exercising the Rule of Law and Chinese Traditional Culture

Expression and Practice:the Theory of Juristical Act in the Realistic Background of China

The "Presence" and "Absence" of Law:Analysis of Sociology of Law on a Maintenance-dispute-resolution Event

On the Legal Culture Analysis of Yanzhou Anti-Church Case in Late Qing Dynasty

Towards a Jurisprudence of Legislators--A Reflective Look at Contemporary Jurisprudence against the Backdrop of Law Transplantation

Not Self-evident "Chinese Legal Ideal-Picture"

The Legalization of Culture Market Regulation

Criteria For Determining Illegality And The Theory Of Anti-Value Acts (Handlungsuntvert): With A Discussion Of The Standpoint Of Contemporary Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence