Preliminary study on relations between GCF and periodontal clinical index under two sampling method

Chen Qun,Chen Jianming,Yan Fuhua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2600.2007.06.055
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the differences of two sampling methods(one-time sampling,repeat sampling)in study of gingival crevicular fluid(GCF).Methods Twenty-eighty teeth of chronic gingival patients and 52 teeth of 13 chronic periodontal patients were selected and treated with ultrasonic scaling.Before and after treatment clinical indexes and GCF were recorded in all samples.GCF in all cases were sampled repeatedly with one-time sampling and repeat sampling.Results There were significant descendence in each clinical index and repeat sampling GCF in all samples by periodontal treatment,except for AL in periodontal group,and it was statistically different.GCF decreased in gingival group with one-time sample method,but there was no statistical difference.GCF only related to BI with one-time sampling,but the index was less(r=0.356,P<0.01)(before treatment,BT)(r=0.385,P<0.01)(after treatment,AT).GCF related to BI and PI with repeat sampling,and the BI index was r=0.399(P<0.01)(BT),r=0.402(P<0.01)(AT);the PI index was r=0.320(P<0.01)(BT),r=0.276(P<0.01)(AT);And one-time sampling was in relation to repeat sampling greater.Conclusion Because there might be some saliva in the gingival groove when first sampled,so it may influent GCF greater.Repeat sampling can decrease the influence of saliva.Repeat sampling may be better than one time sampling in study of GCF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?