Effects of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Ventilation with Prone Position Upper Torso and Lower Legs on Respiratory Function During General Anesthesia in Burnt Patients with Inhalational Lung Injury

Q. W. Fan,L. Gong,Q. Xue,B. Yu,R. Eltringham
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) with prone position (torso raised and legs lowered, 15—20°) on respiratory function during general anaesthesia in burnt patients with inhalational lung injury. Methods Forty-five burnt patients with inhalational lung injury, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ, aged 20—48 years, were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15). They were treated with tracheal intubation or tracheotomy ventilation and scheduled for early excision and grafting of burn wound. In group A, intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with flat prone position was applied. In group B, IPPV+PEEP with flat prone position was applied. In group C, IPPV+PEEP with the prone position (torso raised and legs lowered, 15—20°) was applied. IPPV (oxygen flow meter: 2 L/min, fraction of inspired oxygen: 80%, tidal volume: 8—10 mL/kg, respiratory rate: 12 bpm) was performed in all three groups during maintenance of anaesthesia. PEEP [5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O: 0.098 kPa)] was performed in group B and C. The pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and end tidal carbon dioxide pressure (petCO2) were monitored when the patients were awake and spontaneous breathing with room air for 5 minutes (T0) and when the patients inhaled oxygen for 3 minutes before induction of anaesthesia (T1). And the SpO2, petCO2, peak and plat airway pressure (ppeak and pplat), chest wall and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were recorded at 5 minutes after induction (T2) and at 5 (T3), 30 (T4), 60 (T5) and 120 minutes (T6) after changing position from supine to prone. Arterial blood samples were taken to detect the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO2) and carbon dioxide (paCO2) at T0, T5 and T6. Results The values of SpO2 at T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 were significantly higher than that at T0 in all the patients (P0.01). The values of SpO2 in group B and group C were significantly higher than those in group A at T4, T5 and T6 (P0.05). The values of petCO2 at T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 were significantly lower than those at T0 in all the patients (P0.01). The values of petCO2 in group B and group C at T5 and T6 were significantly lower than those in group A (P0.05). The levels of ppeak and pplat in group A and group B at T3, T4, T5 and T6 were significantly higher than those in group A and group B at T2 and those in group C at T3, T4, T5 and T6 (P0.05); so were the levels of Cdyn (P0.05). The values of paO2 in all three groups at T5 and T6 were significantly higher than those at T0 (P0.01, 0.05). The values of paO2 in group B and group C at T5 and T6 were significantly higher than those in group A (P0.05, 0.01). The values of paCO2 in all three groups at T5 and T6 were significantly lower than those at T0 (P0.05). The values of paCO2 in group B and group C at T5 and T6 were significantly lower than those in group A (P0.05). Conclusion IPPV+PEEP with the prone position (torso improve and legs lowered, 15—20°) can effectively improve ventilation, redress hypoxemia and hypercapnia, and raise the compliance for the burnt patients with inhalational lung injury during general anesthesia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?