Optimizing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Based on Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

P Hancı,ET Demir,B Şekerci,V İnal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_103_24
2024-08-01
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Abstract:Background: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a crucial component of mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in critically ill patients with respiratory failure. The interaction between abdominal and thoracic compartment pressures is known well. Especially in intra-abdominal hypertension, lower PEEP may cause atelectotrauma by repetitive opening and closing of alveoli. Aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of PEEP adjustment according to the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on oxygenation and clarify possible harms. Method: Patients older than 18 were mechanically ventilated due to hypoxemic respiratory failure and had normal IAP (<15 mmHg) included in the study. Patients with severe cardiovascular dysfunction were excluded. The following PEEP levels were applied: PEEPzero of 0 cmH2O, PEEP IAP/2 = 50% of IAP, and PEEP IAP = 100% of IAP. After a 30-minute equilibration period, arterial blood gases and mean arterial pressures were measured. Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (mean age 66.5 ± 15.9, 56.5% male) enrolled on the study. The mean IAP was 9.8 ± 3.4. Seventy-nine percent of the patients’ PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio was under 300 mmHg. Figure 1 shows the change in PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, PaCO 2 , PPlato, and MAP of the patients according to the PEEP levels. Overall increases were detected in the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio ( P < 0.001) and Pplato ( P < 0.001), while PaCO 2 and MAP did not change after increasing PEEP gradually. Pairwise analyses revealed differences in PaO 2 /FiO 2 between PEEPzero (186.4 [85.7–265.8]) and PEEP IAP/2 (207.7 [101.7–292.9]) (t = -0.77, P < 0.001), between baseline and PEEP IAP (236.1 [121.4–351.0]) (t = -1.7, P < 0.001), and between PEEP IAP/2 and PEEP IAP (t = -1.0, P < 0.001). Plato pressures were in the safe range (<30 cmH 2 O) at all three PEEP levels (PEEPzero = 12 [10–15], PEEP IAP/2 = 15 [13–18], PEEP IAP = 17 [14–22]). Conclusion: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and mechanically ventilated, PEEP adjustment according to the IAB improves oxygenation, especially in the settings of the limited source where other PEEP titration methods are absent.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?