A Comparative Study of Three Diagnostic Methods for Detection of Canine Parvovirus Infection in Dogs

宋永奇,李玉燕,吕艳丽,韩博,李伊立,贾君影,付丽娟
2008-01-01
Abstract:Three diagnostic methods for canine parvovirus(CPV) infection were employed to test 120 feces samples collected from dogs with diarrhea and/or vomit in this study.The CPV positive samples were 60,49 and 68,respectively by detecting CPV antigen or nucleic acid using Antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test Kit,haemagglutination/haemagglutination inhibition(HA/HI) and PCR assay.The results of these three methods were evaluated.The percentages showed 100.0%,84.5% and 90.8%,respectively in relative sensitivity,specificity and overall agreement between Antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test Kit and HA/HI,and 85.3%,96.2% and 90.0 %,respectively between Antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test Kit and PCR.These results indicated that HA/HI was more specific than Antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test Kit but had a relatively lower sensitivity.PCR was sensitive and specific,but it was not a suitable test in clinic.The Antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test Kit was the first choice for detecting CPV infection if correctly used.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?