Abstract:Objective To evaluate clinical value of the change of pressure gradient between mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) and central venous pressure (CVP) in fluid responsiveness for septic shock patients. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted. Twenty patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical ventilation who admitted to intensive care unit of Nanjing Drum-tower Hospital from January 2017 to September 2017 were enrolled. All patients underwent volume expansion (VE) (300 ml saline for 20 min, rapid intravenous infusion). The patients were divided into fluid responded group (ΔCI≥10%) and fluid unresponded group (ΔCI<10%), according to the change of cardiac output index (ΔCI) after VE. The hemodynamic parameters [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), extravascularlung water index (EVLWI), stroke volume variation (SVV), Pmsf, Pmsf-CVP, the change of Pmsf (ΔPmsf), Δ(Pmsf-CVP)] before and after VE were recorded. The hemodynamic parameters were compared between two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze the value of hemodynamic parameters in fluid responsiveness. Results VE were performed in 26 instances in 20 patients, among which 17 instances were fluid responded. Pmsf and (Pmsf-CVP) before VE in responsive group were significantly lower than those of the non-responsive group [(19.06±3.03) mmHg vs (23.00±5.96) mmHg, (8.29±3.92) mmHg vs (14.78±6.12) mmHg, t=-2.26, -3.30, all P<0.05]. ΔPmsf and Δ(Pmsf-CVP) in responsive group were significantly higher than those of the non-responsive group [10.00(6.00, 14.00) mmHg vs 4.00 (1.00, 9.50)mmHg, 7.00(3.50, 11.50) mmHg vs -1.00(-2.00, 3.00) mmHg, z=-2.57, -2.75, all P<0.05]. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of Pmsf before VE, (Pmsf-CVP) before VE, ΔPmsf and Δ(Pmsf-CVP) for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 0.739, 0.810, 0.810 and 0.902 respectively, which was significantly higher than that of ΔCVP (AUC=0.654). The optimal cut-off value of Pmsf before VE for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 21.98 mmHg with a sensitivity of 88.2%, and a specificity of 66.7%. The optimal cut-off value of (Pmsf-CVP) before VE for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 11.48 mmHg with a sensitivity of 88.2%, and a specificity of 77.8%. The optimal cut-off value of ΔPmsf for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 5.5 mmHg with a sensitivity of 82.4%, and a specificity of 66.7%. The optimal cut-off value of Δ(Pmsf-CVP) for evaluating fluid responsiveness was 3.5 mmHg with a sensitivity of 76.5%, and a specificity of 100.0%. Conclusion Pmsf before VE, (Pmsf-CVP) before VE, ΔPmsf and Δ(Pmsf-CVP) can evaluate fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock and undergoing mechanical ventilation. Δ(Pmsf-CVP) has the highest value among these parameters. Key words: Septic shock; Fluid responsiveness; Mean systemic filling pressure; Change of pressure gradient between mean systemic filling pressure and central venous pressure

The Clinical Value of Pulse Pressure Variation to Monitor the Fluid Responsiveness and Effects of PEEP in Ventilated Patients with Acute Lung Injury

Clinical value of pulmonary vascular permeability index in diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome

Clinical Study of Passive Leg Raising As an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Severe Septic Patients

Comparison Between Changes in Systolic-Pressure Variation and Pulse-Pressure Variation After Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients

[Assessment of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Induced Lung Volume Change by Ultrasound in Mechanically Ventilated Patients].

Effect of Extrinsic positive end expiratory pressure on arterial blood gas and Hemodynamics in patients with atelectasis

Effect of ventilation with high levels of PEEP and lower-tidal volume on the hemodynamics in patients with normal respiratory function

Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study

Effect of Different Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Cardiac Preload and Predictability of Different Cardiac Preload Indexes on Patients Treated with Mechanical Ventilation

Passive Leg Raising As an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Severe Sepsis

Clinical Evaluation of the Change of Pressure Gradient Between Mean Systemic Filling Pressure and Central Venous Pressure in Fluid Responsiveness for Septic Shock Patients

Effects of Different PEEP on Abdominal Pressure and Liver in COPD Patients

Influence on cardiac - pulmonary function of acute respiratory failure patients by airway pressure release ventilation and intermittent positive pressure ventilation modes

The Influence of Blood Coagulation and Physiology Function of high Positive end Expiratory Pressure Indication of Mechanical Ventilation on Patients with Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema

Comparison of pulse pressure variation versus echocardiography-derived stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated anesthetized dogs

Optimization of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure by Volumetric Capnography Variables in Lavage-Induced Acute Lung Injury.

The increase in cardiac output induced by a decrease in positive end-expiratory pressure reliably detects volume responsiveness: the PEEP-test study

Accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with biphasic positive airway pressure mode

Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on the Central Venous Pressure of Patients with Different Respiratory System Compliance

Preliminary study: Low to moderate PEEP effects on ICP in acute neurological injury patients under mechanical ventilation

Plethysmography variation index versus pulse pressure variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgeries during immediate postoperative period