Abstract:The hot compressive deformation behavior of a new Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy was studied in the temperature range of 950–1150 °C and strain rate range of 0.0003–1 s −1 using hot compression tests. The effect of processing parameters on flow stress, activation energy, power dissipation η maps and instability maps were investigated. The results show that the flow stress decreases with increasing temperature and decreasing strain rate. The apparent activation energy of deformation decreases while the values of η in the peak zones increase with increasing strain, due to the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization. When the strain is 0.5, a domain with its peak η of 40% occurs at 1050 °C and 0.0003 s −1 , which corresponds to dynamic recrystallization with grain size of ASTM 10–11 and can be as the optimum processing parameters for good workability. Keywords P/M superalloy Flow stress Dynamic material model Dynamic recrystallization Processing parameters 1 Introduction The γ′ precipitate strengthened Ni–Cr–Co based superalloy combines excellent oxidation resistance with mechanical properties at high temperatures. The excellent working and mechanical properties make it a potential material for gas turbine applications as well as high temperature attaching parts. The powder metallurgy (P/M) route was found to be attractive for the manufacture of turbine components in Ni–Cr–Co based superalloys [1,2] . Based on the published chemical compositions of the typical third generation P/M superalloys [3–5] , a new Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy was designed with the aid of the thermodynamic calculation results [6] and d-electron theory [7,8] . Compared with the first and second generations P/M superalloys, the new alloy was designed for thermal stability in long time service condition and controlled the precipitation of topologically close packed (TCP) phases. It produced the mass ratios of Al/Ti and Nb/Ta of be unity, in order to achieve the desired combination of properties [9] . It also added a certain amount of Hf, to enhance the comprehensive performance [10] . While hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and other techniques were developed, the need for a subsequent isothermal forging process was well recognized because it helped in mitigating the undesirable effects of prior particle boundaries (PPB) [11,12] . But this alloy is rather difficult to deform because of its poor workability. For this new alloy, controlling the forging process to attain a uniform microstructure is very important. Therefore, the effect of processing parameters on hot compressive deformation behavior is essential for the optimization of isothermal forging process. The trial and error methods were generally employed in selecting the hot deformation processing parameters while the recently developed processing map was found to be a very useful tool for optimizing workability and controlling microstructure in superalloys. Somani et al. [13,14] investigated the effect of processing conditions on microstructure evolution of P/M Nimonic AP-1 and IN-100 superalloys using processing map. Srinivasan et al. [15] studied the hot working characteristic of Nimonic 75, 80A and 90 using processing map in the ranges of temperature 850–1200 °C and strain rate 0.001–100 s −1 . Babu et al. [16] did the work on development and validation of processing maps for nickel based P/M superalloys IN 100, MA754 and AP-1. Cai et al. [17] developed the processing maps for GH708 in deformation temperature range 1050–1180 °C and strain rate range 0.01–10 s −1 , and pointed out that the strain had a slight effect on the processing maps. Aghaie-Khafri et al. [18] investigated the hot workability of Hastelloy X by calculating flow localization parameter and construction of workability map for shear band. Then it was compared with the developed processing map. Liu et al. [19] established the processing map of Haynes230 on the basis of dynamic material model. The optimum conditions for hot working were at deformation temperature of 1150 °C and strain rate of 0.001 s −1 . Processing map was developed on the basis of the dynamic material model (DMM), which aimed to correlate the constitutive behavior with microstructure evolution, flow instability and hot workability [13–19] . Briefly, the work-piece undergoing hot deformation was considered to be a dissipater of power supplied by a particular source. The true stress–true strain curve and the flow behavior of materials were strongly dependent on the strain rate and temperature. The general form of the flow behavior at constant strain and temperature was expressed as (1) σ = K ε ˙ m | ε , T where K and m were considered as constants. From Eq. (1) , m could be obtained as (2) m = ∂ ( ln σ ) ∂ ( ln ε ˙ ) The total power dissipated P could be calculated as (3) P = σ ε ˙ = G + J = ∫ 0 ε ˙ σ d ε ˙ + ∫ 0 σ ε ˙ d σ The first integral was defined as G content and represented the main power input dissipated in the form of a temperature rise. The second integral was defined as J co-content and was related to the power dissipated by metallurgical processes. The efficiency of power dissipation occurring through microstructural changes during deformation was derived by comparing the non-linear power dissipation occurring instantaneously in the work-piece with that of a linear dissipater for which the m value was unity, and was defined as (4) η = Δ J / Δ P ( Δ J / Δ P ) line = m / m + 1 1 / 2 = 2 m m + 1 The variation of η with deformation temperature and strain rate constituted the power dissipation map. This map represented the pattern in which the power was dissipated by metallurgical processes. A continuum criterion for the occurrence of flow instability was obtained by utilizing the principle of maximum rate of entropy production and given by (5) ξ ( ε ˙ ) = ∂ ln ( m / m + 1 ) ∂ ( ln ε ˙ ) + m > 0 where ξ ( ε ˙ ) was the instability parameter. Flow instabilities predicted to occur when ξ ( ε ˙ ) became negative. In this study, the hot compressive deformation behavior of a new Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy was systematically investigated by hot compression tests, which were conducted in deformation temperature range of 950–1150 °C and strain rate range of 0.0003–1 s −1 . The effect of processing parameters on flow stress, activation energy, power dissipation η maps and instability maps was investigated. All of these provide a theoretical reference for the actual hot working process. 2 Experiments The hot isostatically pressed (HIPed) Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy was selected as the experimental material with the following chemical composition: Cr 12.92, Co 20.83, Mo 2.64, W 3.85, Al 3.57, Ti 3.53, Nb 1.51, Ta 1.65, C 0.048, B 0.027, Zr 0.043, Hf 0.2, Ni-base. The details of the preparation procedures were as follows: the vacuum induction melting (VIM) and electroslag remelting (ESR) methods were used for alloy smelting; the plasma rotating electrode process (PREP) was used for powder preparation, and the vibration screening and electrostatic separation methods were combined to remove inclusions and produce powder with particle size of 50–150 μm. The powders were encapsulated in AISI 304 stainless steel capsules and sealed after vacuum degassing. The capsules were then HIPed in a single stage at 1180 °C for 4 h at a pressure of 120 MPa. The HIPed rods were then skinned to remove the stainless steel encapsulation. Hot compression tests were conducted using a Gleeble-1500 simulator at the temperatures of 950 °C, 1000 °C, 1050 °C, 1100 °C and 1150 °C and in the strain rate range of 0.0003–1 s −1 with 8 mm diameter, 15 mm high cylindrical specimens. All specimens were heated to the deformation temperatures at a heating rate of 10 °C/s and held for 5 min in order to gain the uniform microstructure before the hot compression test. Then they were deformed to a true strain of 0.7 and water cooled to freeze the microstructure. The selected deformation processing parameters for the new superalloy were similar with the forging parameters of ME3 [4] and LSHR [5] , in order to make the comparisons and assess the ability in achieving a better alloy for the intended application. The load-stroke data obtained in compression were processed to obtain true stress–true strain curves using standard equations. The deformed specimens were sectioned parallel to the compression axis and the cut surfaces were prepared for microstructure observation. The microstructure of as-HIPed and deformed samples was observed using an Olympus optical microscope and with the chemical etchant of CuCl 2 (10 g) + HCl (50 mL) + H 2 O (50 mL), the etching time of 30–60 s. Grain sizes were determined according to ASTM E112 linear intercept procedures using circular grid overlays. Besides, the microstructure of as-HIPed samples was observed using a XL30TMP scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the chemical composition analysis of carbides was performed using a Phoenix energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). For SEM and EDS studies, the preparation method of sample started with electropolishing with 20% sulfuric-methanol and followed by electrolytic etching in a CrO 3 –H 3 PO 4 –sulfuric acid solution, the etching time of 15 s. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Initial Microstructure The typical microstructure of as-HIPed Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy is shown in Fig. 1 . It consists primarily of recrystallized grains with a uniform dispersion of a few apparently undeformed powder particles that have retained as-cast dendritic structure. The HIP treatment at 1180 °C reduces carbide precipitation at PPBs but gives a coarse grained structure. The grain size is about ASTM 7–8. SEM examination of the specimens reveals cuboidal γ′ precipitates ( Fig. 2 (a) ) and carbide particles, mainly at the grain boundaries ( Fig. 2 (b)). The microstructure of Fig. 2 (b) reveals a prior particle boundary (PPB) network by the large primary γ′ precipitates and white carbides. The volume fraction of γ′ phase is estimated to be 55%. The EDS recorded at the carbides at the grain boundaries show that the carbides are Cr, Mo and W based, while the carbides in the matrix are Ti, Ta and Nb based. 3.2 Effect of processing parameters on flow stress The true stress–true strain curves of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy can be easily transformed from the load-displacement data recorded by Gleeble-1500 simulator during hot compression test. Fig. 3 shows the typical true stress–true strain curves obtained from hot compression tests of the alloy. These flow stress curves exhibit a flow softening feature, which is more significant at lower temperatures and higher strain rates. The basic changing trends of flow stress are as follows: the stress increases rapidly with increasing strain at first, then decreases when peak stress is reached and almost be stable under certain variables of strain finally. It means that a typical flow stress curve is composed of three stages: stage I (work hardening stage), stage II (softening stage) and stage III (steady stage). This is a combination effect of work hardening, which is primarily caused by second order pyramidal slip system dislocation motion, and thermally activated softening. In the stage I, the initial rapid rise in stress is associated with an increase in dislocation density and the formation of poorly developed subgrain boundaries, as a result of work hardening and dynamic recovery. As the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy has low stacking fault energy, the dynamic recovery proceeds slowly. The high dislocation density stimulates the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization once a critical strain (usually less than 0.1) is exceeded, then the flow stress decreases which means the coming of stage II. In this stage, the dislocations are annihilated in large numbers through the migration of a high angle boundary and the stress drops steeply. Finally, stage III (steady stage): the stress becomes steady when a new balance between softening and hardening is obtained [20,21] . From the experimental results (shown in Fig. 3 ), it can be found that the flow stress represents as the characteristic of dynamic crystallization with increasing strain at the deformation temperature lower than 1100 °C and strain rates higher than 0.0003 s −1 . The variation of flow stress with deformation temperatures and strain rates can be seen more clearly in Fig. 4 , where the flow stress at a true strain of 0.4 is plotted as a function of the logarithm of the strain rate and the deformation temperature for all tested conditions in Fig. 4 (a) and (b), respectively. It can be found that the effect of the deformation temperature and strain rate on the flow stress is significant. For the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy, the lower the deformation temperature, the higher the flow stress; while the higher strain rate, the higher the flow stress. This is because low strain rates and high temperatures provide longer time for energy accumulation and higher mobility at boundaries for the nucleation and growth of dynamically recrystallized grains and dislocation annihilation, and thus reduce the flow stress level. So the effect of deformation temperature and strain rate on flow stress can be explained by the terms of dynamic recrystallization and dislocation mechanism. 3.3 Effect of strain on activation energy From the analysis of flow curves of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy ( Fig. 3 ), it is found that the main factors affecting flow stress are deformation temperature, strain rate and strain, and the effect of the former two are more significant ( Fig. 4 ). As both the hot deformation and creep are belong to thermally activated process, hot deformation can be regarded as the extension of creep under the condition with larger strain rate and higher stress. Therefore, the flow stress mainly depends on deformation temperature and strain rate, and there exists dynamic balance between strain hardening and dynamic softening. In this study, the research [22,23] on the constitutive equation between strain rates, temperatures with flow stress are summarized as below. The hyperbolic sine model: (6) ε ˙ = A [ sinh ( α σ ) ] n exp − Q R T The power function model: (7) ε ˙ = A 1 σ n 1 ( low stress , α σ < 0.8 ) The exponential function model (8) ε ˙ = A 2 exp ( β σ ) ( high stress , α σ > 1.2 ) In which, A , A 1 , A 2 , n , n 1 , α and β are the material constants which are independent of temperature and α = β / n 1 , R is the universal gas constant (8.31 J mol −1 K −1 ), T is the absolute temperature (K), Q is the activation energy of hot deformation (kJ/mol) which reflects the difficult degree of hot deformation. Many studies [24–26] show that Eq. (6) can be used to describe the conventional hot deformation process of materials, and also can be simplified to Eq. (7) and Eq. (8) under different stress conditions. As we know, dynamic changes of microstructure and flow stress with the variation of strain are obvious during hot deformation. However, it is commonly accepted that the effect of strain on the flow stress will not be considered in Eq. (6) . Therefore, this study assumes that A , n , α and Q are the material constants which depend on strain. Taking the logarithm of both sides of Eqs. (7) and (8) gives (9) ln σ = ln ε • n 1 − ln A 1 n 1 (10) σ = ln ε • β − ln A 2 β The corresponding flow stress of strain ranging from 0.05 to 0.7 is selected from the flow curves of Fig. 3 . The values of β and n 1 can be obtained by Eqs. (9) and (10) from the slope of the lines in the σ − ln ε • and ln σ − ln ε • plots, respectively. Then, further work on the relations of α with ɛ can be done. Fig. 5 shows both the experimental data and regression results at the strain of 0.3. Obviously, σ with ln ε • and ln σ with ln ε • have good linear relationship, and the correlation coefficients are 0.981–0.993. As the value of Q is independent of temperature, taking the logarithm of both sides of Eq. (6) gives (11) ln ε • = ln A − Q R T + n ln [ sinh ( α σ ) ] For the given strain rate conditions, differentiating Eq. (11) gives (12) Q = R ∂ ln ε • ∂ ln sinh ( α σ ) T ∂ ln sinh ( α σ ) ∂ ( 1 T ) ε • By substituting the values of flow stress and strain rate for all the tested temperatures into Eq. (11) , the relations of ln sinh ( α σ ) with ln ε • and ln sinh ( α σ ) with 1 T can be obtained, as shown in Fig. 6 . From this kind of figure, the values of n and A can be easily obtained, and Q can be calculated by Eq. (11) under different strain. The values of Q with the variation of strain are shown in Fig. 7 . It is found that their values decrease with increasing strain. The main reasons for the change of Q can be considered as: In the initial stage, only a small number of soft-oriented slip systems and grain take part in the deformation, so the value of Q is relatively high. While with the increase of deformation strain, grain rotation occurs and more slip systems are activated, leading to the decrease of Q . Herein, the relation of Q with strain is fitted and gives as Eqs. (13) . (13) Q = 811.3 − 86.25 ε − 1401 ε 2 + 2502 ε 3 − 1634 ε 4 The values of Q can be expressed as 4th order polynomial function, as shown in Fig. 7 . It is easy to find that the regression curves fit the experimental data very well and the values of mean square deviation are almost equal to zero. 3.4 Effect of strain on power dissipation maps The flow stress data obtained from the flow curves of Fig. 3 were friction-revised by Gubkin formula. Then they were corrected for adiabatic temperature rise using Aresenault method, in order to ensure the accuracy of the experimental data. The log of flow stress vs. log of strain rate data were fitted using a cubic spline function and the strain rate sensitivity m was calculated as a function of strain rate according to Eq. (2) . This was repeated at different temperatures. The calculated efficiency of power dissipation η was plotted as isoefficiency contour maps by the software of Surfer 8.0. As shown in Fig. 8 , the values of η increase with increasing deformation temperature and decreasing strain rate, except for the lower right corner of the contour maps at high temperatures and low strain rates. It may have a relation with grain growth, dissolution and coarsen of γ′ phases. In addition, within the deformation conditions of this study, it is also found that the peak zones in the upper right corner of η contour maps change from a semi-circle at the strain of 0.1 into a closed circle at the strain of 0.7. The peak zones move to the region of lower temperatures and higher strain rates. The values of η gradually increase with increasing strain, and good hot workability can be obtained. The Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy is a γ–γ′ alloy with an estimated volume fraction of γ′ of 55%. The γ′ dissolution of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy starts occurring from 1155 °C and completes at 1165 °C [6] . As the carbides were not significantly present in the microstructure, the alloy may be essentially considered as a two phase alloy within the experimental conditions of this study. The characteristics of a two phase alloy under hot working conditions were analyzed using processing maps [27] . A typical power dissipation map generated in the temperature range of 950–1150 °C and strain rate range of 0.0003–1 s −1 at a strain range from 0.1 to 0.7 is shown in Fig. 8 . In the Fig. 8 (c), the map Exhibits 4 different domains according to the characteristic values of η : domain I occuring at 1050–1150 °C and 0.1–1 s −1 (upper right), with the η value of 38–40%; domain II occuring at 1000–1060 °C and 0.0003–0.001 s −1 (middle bottom), with the η value of 36–40%; domain III occuring at 1080–1150 °C and 0.0003–0.01 s −1 (lower right), with the η value of less than 30%; domain IV occuring at 950–1050 °C and 0.1–1 s −1 (upper left), with the η value of less than 34%. The power dissipation maps are continuum maps and are interpreted in terms of the microstructural processes. For domain I, the sample at 1050 °C and 0.1 s −1 shows obvious dynamic recrystallization characteristics ( Fig. 9 (a) ), with the grain size of ASTM 8.5–9.0. For domain II, according to the atomistic processing map of Raj [28] , the observed domain may correspond either to superplasticity or DRX. The efficiency of power dissipation for superplasticity is generally very high (>60%). This is not observed in the map of Fig. 8 (c) since the peak efficiency is not higher than 40%. In view of this observation, the domain observed does not represent superplastic deformation. Hence, the domain in the processing map can be interpreted in terms of DRX. On the basis of the hot deformation microstructural observations ( Fig. 9 (b)), the recrystallization region can be identified in the power dissipation map at a strain of 0.5 ( Fig. 8 (c)). The average grain size of the hot deformed sample ( Fig. 9 (b)) is ASTM 10–11. The grain refinement effect of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy is slightly better than ME3 [4] and LSHR [5] under the same deformation conditions. For domain III, as shown in Figs. 8 (c), there are low value of η under different strain. Further, they decrease with increasing strain. This is because the significant grain growth appears at high temperature and low strain rate condition. The grain size is ASTM 6.0–6.5 ( Fig. 9 (c)). The plasticity deteriorates and the hot workability becomes worse. In addition, intercrystalline cracking is also detected in the sample under 1150 °C and 3 × 10 −4 s −1 , as shown in positions A and B of Fig. 9 (d). For the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy, there is some residual dendrite which leads to the chemical segregation along the grain boundaries. It results in intergranular cracking. Meanwhile, wedge cracking occurs at grain boundary triple junctions, as shown in positions C and D of Fig. 9 (d). It is similar with the result of P/M IN-100 [14] . Fig. 10 shows the peak η of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy changes with strain. When the strain is not higher than 0.5, the positions of peak η do not change and at deformation temperature of 1050 °C and strain rates of 0.0003 s −1 , as shown in Fig. 10 (a). Besides, it can be seen from Fig. 3 that the flow stress increases with increasing strain and reaches the peak value almost at the strain of 0.1. In this stage, dislocation motion is considered as the dominant deformation mechanism. But with the further increasing of strain, dynamic recrystallization occurs and leads to both flow stress and activation energy ( Fig. 7 ) decreasing fast. So the peak η of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy occurs at the strain of 0.2, as shown in Fig. 10 (b). 3.5 Effect of strain on instability maps The instability maps for the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy are shown in Fig. 11 . These maps reveal the limiting temperature and strain rate conditions where fracture and instabilities occur during the deformation of materials. It is easy to find that the instability zone shrinks to the region of lower temperatures and higher strain rates with increasing strain. As hot compressive deformation is a thermally activated process, accompany with grain rotation, more slip systems are activated when the strain increases. It results in the decrease of activation energy ( Fig. 7 ), making it easier for the progress of hot deformation. Besides, it is easy to find that the instability zone indicated by Fig. 11 is also considered as domain IV in Fig. 8 (c). The 45° shear cracking ( Fig. 12 (a) ) is observed in the hot-deformed sample in the instability zone. This is caused by the maximum shear stress along the 45° direction from the compression axis during the hot compression test. The lower the deformation temperatures and the higher the strain rates, the greater the tendency for shear cracking it is. Also there are longitudinal cracking ( Fig. 12 (b)) and mixed-type cracking ( Fig. 12 (c)). The direction of longitudinal cracking is parallel to the compression axis. It mainly results from the tensile stress in the hoop direction caused by the compressive deformation process. When the superalloy deforms at lower temperatures and higher strain rates, the mixed-type cracking appears by the combining effect of the shear stress along the 45° direction from the compression axis and the hoop tensile stress. The phenomenon of large bulk caving can be seen, as shown in Fig. 12 (c). After the full observation of the characteristics of power dissipation η maps and instability maps under different strain, it is found that there are two peak domains locating at the same positions as domain I and II when the strain ranges from 0.1 to 0.5. The peak domain with lower strain rates will disappear within the experimental conditions, if the strain exceeds 0.5. The power dissipation η map and instability map for the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy at the strain rate of 3 × 10 −4 s −1 are plotted, as shown in Fig. 13 . The alloy has relatively high power dissipation efficiency ( Fig. 13 (a)) when the temperature is about 1050 °C. But the instability region appears when the strain is higher than 0.5 ( Fig. 13 (b)). In order to validate the predictability of hot processing maps, two samples at 1050 °C and 3 × 10 −4 s −1 with the strain of 0.5 and 0.6, respectively are subjected to hot compression test. The former has no cracks while the latter has obvious longitudinal cracks, as shown in Fig. 14 . This is in agreement with the hot processing maps under the corresponding strain. Therefore, it is recommended that the first-step forging strain of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy should be not higher than 0.5. Generally, with the full consideration in the effect of strain rate, temperature and strain on flow stress, activation energy, power dissipation η maps and instability maps, the optimum condition for good workability is at 1050 °C and 0.0003 s −1 with the strain of 0.5. The microstructure and flow instability of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy are consistent with hot processing maps based on DMM within the experimental conditions. The results can provide a theoretical reference for the actual hot working process optimization of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy. 4 Conclusions The hot compressive deformation behavior of a new Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy by means of the hot compression test have been investigated in the temperature range of 950–1150 °C and strain rate range of 0.0003–1 s −1 by Gleeble-1500 thermal simulator. The following conclusions have been drawn from the results of this investigation. 1. The true stress–true strain flow curves of the Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy shows the typical characteristics of dynamic recrystallization and dynamic recovery. The flow stress decreases with increasing deformation temperature and decreasing strain rate. The flow stress represents as the characteristic of dynamic recrystallization with increasing strain at the deformation temperature lower than 1100 °C and strain rates higher than 0.0003 s −1 . 2. The values of Q decrease with increasing strain. In the initial stage, only a small number of soft-oriented slip systems and grain take part in the deformation, so the value of Q is relatively high. While with the increase of deformation strain, grain rotation occurs and more slip systems are activated, leading to the decrease of Q . The values of Q can be expressed as 4th order polynomial function. 3. The values of η increase with increasing deformation temperature and decreasing strain rate. Within the deformation conditions of this study, it is also found that the peak zones in the upper right corner of η contour maps change from a semi-circle at the strain of 0.1 into a closed circle at the strain of 0.7. The peak zones move to the region of lower temperatures and higher strain rates. The values of η also gradually increase with increasing strain and the peak η occurs at the strain of 0.2. 4. The power dissipation map at a strain of 0.5 Exhibits 4 different domains according to the characteristic values of η : domain I occuring at 1050–1150 °C and 0.1–1 s −1 (upper right), with the η value of 38–40%, the domain shows obvious dynamic recrystallization characteristic; domain II occuring at 1000–1060 °C and 0.0003–0.001 s −1 (middle bottom), with the η value of 36–40%, the domain can be interpreted in terms of DRX and grain refinement; domain III occuring at 1080–1150 °C and 0.0003–0.01 s −1 (lower right), with the η value of less than 30%, the domain reveals the phenomena of grain growth, intergranular and wedge cracking; domain IV occuring at 950–1050 °C and 0.1–1s −1 (upper left), with the η value of less than 34%. The domain belongs to the flow instability zone which shrinks with the increasing strain, and reveals the phenomena of shear cracking, longitudinal cracking and mixed-type cracking. Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by National Pre-research Funds for Weapons and Equipment and High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2007AA03A223). References [1] W.C. Robert Nature 276 1978 209 210 [2] C.H. Symonds J.M. Eggar G.J. Lewis R.J. Siddall Powder. Metall. Int. 15 1983 30 35 [3] T.P. Gabb J. Gayda NASA-TM-211218 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2001 Glenn Research Center Celeveland, OH, USA [4] T.P. Gabb K. O’Connor NASA-TM-210901 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2001 Glenn Research Center Celeveland, OH, USA [5] T.P. Gabb J. Gayda J. Falsey NASA-TM-213649 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2005 Glenn Research Center Celeveland, OH, USA [6] K. Wu G.Q. Liu B.F. Hu H. Wu Y.W. Zhang Y. Tao J.T. Liu J. Univ. Sci, Technol. Beijing 31 2009 722-710 (In Chinese) [7] N. Yukama M. Morinaga H. Ezaki Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature Materials for Power Applications 1986 Dordrecht Holland pp935 [8] N. Yukama M. Morinaga Y. Murata Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Superalloy TMS, Pennsylvania 1988 pp. 225 [9] T.P. Gabb J. Gayda J. Telesman P.T. Kantzos W.A. Konkel NASA-TM-2120 86 National Aeronautics Space Administration 2003 Glenn Research Center Celeveland, OH, USA [10] J. Radavich T. Carneiro D. Furrer J. Lemsky A. Banik proceeding of the eleventh international symposium on advanced superalloys-production and application The effect of Hafnium, Niobium, and heat treatment on advanced powder metallurgy superalloys, edited by the Chinese Society for Metals (Shanghai) 2007 [11] T.L. Prakash Y.N. Chari E.S. Bhagiradha Rao R. Thamburaj Metall. Trans. A 14 1983 733 742 [12] R. Thamburaj W. Wallace Y.N. Chari T.L. Prakash Powder. Metall. 27 1984 169 180 [13] M.C. Somani N.C. Birla Y.V.R.K. Prasad V. Singh J. Mater. Process. Technol. 52 1995 225 237 [14] M.C. Somani K. Muraleedharan Y.V.R.K. Prasad V. Singh Mater. Sci. Eng. A 245 1998 88 99 [15] N. Srinivasan Y.V.R.K. Prasad J. Mater. Process. Technol. 51 1995 171 192 [16] N.S. Babu S.B. Tiwari B.N. Rao Powder. Metall. 49 2006 160 166 [17] D.Y. Cai L.Y. Xiong W.C. Liu G.D. Sun M. Yao Mater. Charact. 58 2007 941 946 [18] M. Aghaie-Khafri N. Golarzingh Mater. Sci. Eng. A 486 2008 641 647 [19] Y. Liu R. Hu J.S. Li H.C. Kou H.W. Li H. Chang H.Z. Fu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 209 2009 4020 4026 [20] T. Sakai J.J. Jonas Acta. Mater. 32 1984 189 209 [21] H.J. Mcqueen Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387–389 2004 203 208 [22] F. Garofalo Trans. AIME 227 1963 3351 3356 [23] C.M. Sellars W.M. Tegart Acta. Metall 14 1966 1136 1138 [24] Z.J. Gronostajski J. Mater. Process. Technol. 78 1998 84 89 [25] C.A.C. Imbert H.J. Mcqueen Mater. Sci. Eng. A 313 2001 88 103 [26] Y.C. Lin M.S. Chen J. Zhong J. Mater. Process. Technol. 205 2008 308 315 [27] J. Luo M.Q. Li H. Li W.X. Yu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 505 2009 88 95 [28] R. Raj Metall. Trans. A 12 1981 1089 1097

Abstract:Research highlights ► HIPed P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 prepared by plasma rotation electric pole (PREP) powder exhibits high flow stress at lower temperatures (<1050 °C). ► The effect of preparation technology on hot deformation behavior is slight at higher temperatures (>1050 °C) or lower strain rates (<0.01 s −1 ). ► The activation energy decreases with the increase of strain. ► The activation energy of the alloy prepared by PREP powder is higher than that prepared by argon atomization (AA) powder. ► The heat treatment time has a significant influence on recrystallized grain size for the alloy prepared by AA powder. Abstract In this paper, the hot deformation characteristics of P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 prepared by different powder preparation technologies were studied in the deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1100 °C and the strain rate range from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 using hot compression tests. The peak stress vs. deformation temperature curves and the peak stress vs. strain rate curves were established, respectively. The results show that the specimens prepared by plasma rotation electric pole (PREP) powder were more sensitive to deformation temperature and strain rate. On the basis of the dynamic material model, the processing maps for hot working were developed. The activation energies and Zener–Hollomon parameters were obtained by linear statistical regression method. For the specimens prepared by PREP powder, the peaks of power dissipation mainly located in lower temperature domain (1000–1030 °C), and the efficiencies of power dissipation (EPD) obtained in the strain range from 0.1 to 0.7 were essentially similar. This indicated that strain had a slight influence on processing maps. For the specimens prepared by argon atomization (AA) powder, the effects of strain on EPD and instability domains were significant. The lower activation energies and Z values indicated that the workability of the specimens prepared by AA powder is better than that prepared by PREP powder. Moreover, it was found that effects of the heat treatment time on activation energy and Zener–Hollomon parameter were significant. With the increase of heat treatment time, the dislocation density and the volume fraction of precipitation phase gradually decreased. Microstructural observation demonstrated that the phenomenon of recrystallized grains coarsening existed in the specimens prepared by longer heat treatment time. The heat treatment time of the specimens prepared by AA powder should be appropriately shortened in order to prevent recrystallized grains coarsening. Abbreviations AA argon atomization PREP plasma rotation electric pole PPBs prior particle boundaries EPD efficiency of power dissipation HIP hot isostatic pressing DRX dynamic recrystallization DRV dynamic recover DMM dynamic materials model GB grain boundary Keywords P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 Preparation technology Processing map Peak stress Activation energy Zener–Hollomon parameter 1 Introduction The nickel-base superalloy FGH96 (nominal composition Ni–15Cr–4W–3Mo–2Al–3Ti) is a type of damage-tolerant nickel-base superalloy prepared by power metallurgy (PM). In aviation industry, the uniform microstructure, high working temperature and low crack growth rate make it widely applicable for turbine disks [1,2] . However, microstructural instability and cracking may be generated during deformation owing to higher strain rate sensitivity index and narrower forging temperature range. In order to improve the workability of this alloy, the further investigation must be conducted focused on the microstructural deformation mechanism. It has been accepted that the initial microstructure obtained by different powder metallurgy technologies and heat treatment regimes significantly affected the workability of the materials during hot working. At present, two types of powder preparation technologies applied to the P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 are plasma rotation electric pole (PREP) and argon atomization (AA). PREP technology uses plasma arc to melt high-speed rotating alloy bar, and makes liquid drops cooled in inert gases. Owing to centrifugal force, the differences between two types of powders are mainly in particle shape, density and size range. In general, PREP powder exhibits uniform spherical shape and has less hollow particles. Thus, the microstructure prepared by above powder preparation technologies may be influenced. The main production methods for the P/M nickel-base superalloy are as follows: hot isostatic pressing (HIP), direct hot extrusion, HIP + forging, hot extrusion + forging, HIP + heat treatment and HIP + hot extrusion. However, the prior particle boundaries (PPBs) were annihilated during hot extrusion and forging because the dynamic recrystallization (DRX) would occur when deformation was enough large, which lead to inexplicit effect of powder preparation technologies. By comparing, the P/M nickel-base superalloy prepared by HIP could preserve PPBs [3] . Thus, the investigation was conducted based on HIP in this paper. For optimizing microstructure and hot working technology, it is very important to investigate the effect of initial microstructure on the deformation behavior of the P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 based on different powder preparation technologies. It is well known that processing map is beneficial for optimizing hot working processes and controlling microstructure in this type of material. Reddy and Srinivasan [4] investigated the hot deformation behavior of spray formed + HIPed Al–Li alloy using processing map, and found that the grain boundary cavitations and flow localization may cause cracking processes in instability domains. Kim and Kwon [5] studied on the surface defect prediction in the hot bar rolling based on processing map, and the processing maps were derived based on two available approaches. Gronostajski et al. [6] investigated the processing map of CuAl9·2Fe3 aluminium bronze and pointed out that the dynamic recover (DRV) was dominating at the temperatures below 645–680 K, and above these temperatures, DRX was dominating. Venugopal and Sivaprasad [7] used a series of industrial hot forming operations to validate the predictions of the processing map of 304L. The results showed that excellent correlation existed between processing maps and microstructures. Krishna and Prasad [8] pointed out that the occurrence of superplasticity was attributed to two-phase micro-duplex structure, higher strain rate sensitivity and lower flow stress by researching the processing maps of near-α alloy 685. Liu and Hu [9] found that strain had a slight influence on processing maps of Haynes230, and Cai et al. [10] also obtained the same conclusion for a nickel-base superalloy. Wang and Lu [11] investigated the processing maps of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si alloy, and pointed out that the optimum deformation parameters were at a deformation temperature of 1055 °C and a strain rate of 0.001 s −1 . Although the relation between processing map and hot deformation behavior was studied for other materials, the effect of initial microstructure on workability was less reported on the basis of different preparation technologies. In this paper, the hot deformation behavior of HIPed P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 was investigated based on processing map and activation energy. The basis for processing map and the problem in applying processing map theory to the material are presented. The processing map is developed on the basis of the dynamic materials model (DMM), which is recently reviewed by Prasad [12] and Gegel [13] . According to DMM, processing map is consisted of power dissipation map and instability map. The efficiency of power dissipation (EPD) is a dimensionless parameter and reflects the ratio of dissipated power used for microstructure evolution. And, it is a function of deformation temperature and strain rate in the power dissipation map [14–16] . The variation of EPD with temperature and strain rate could exhibit some specific microstructural mechanisms. In general, high EPD is usually related to DRX in hot deformation [3] . The absorbed power P in plastic deformation process can be expressed as: (1) P = σ ⋅ ε ˙ = G + J = ∫ 0 ε ˙ σ d ε ˙ + ∫ 0 σ ε ˙ d σ where σ is the flow stress (MPa) and ε ˙ is the strain rate (s −1 ). The power caused by plastic deformation is expressed by G , and the dissipated power caused by microstructure evolution is indicated by J [17,18] . The power dissipation J can be defined as: (2) J = ∫ 0 σ ε ˙ d σ = m m + 1 σ ε ˙ where m is the strain rate sensitivity index. The EPD η is a ratio of power dissipation to its maximum value. It is given by the following equation: (3) η = J J max = 2 m m + 1 According to plastic flow continuity principle, material instability may occur when the value of d D / d ε ˙ is lower than that of D / ε ˙ . Based on DMM, the stability function is as follows [19–21] : (4) ξ ( ε ˙ ) = ∂ log ( m / m + 1 ) ∂ log ε ˙ + m when ξ ( ε ˙ ) < 0 , the flow instability procedure will execute. It can be seen that the parameter ξ ( ε ˙ ) is regarded as the function of temperature and strain rate. The variation of the instability parameter ξ ( ε ˙ ) with temperature and strain rate constitutes the instability map. Generally, microstructural manifestations of flow instability are adiabatic shear bands formation, flow localization, dynamic strain aging mechanical twinning and kinking or flow rotations [8] . So, the processing map consisted by power dissipation map and instability map is useful for optimizing hot workability and producing desired microstructure. 2 Experimental The main chemical compositions (wt.%) of the P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 used for investigation are shown in Table 1 . The powder was produced by PREP and AA, respectively. Fig. 1 (a) shows the powder prepared by PREP. It can be seen that the powder was nearly spherical in shape, and its size was more uniform than that of the powder prepared by AA ( Fig. 1 (b)). The average sizes of PREP powder and AA powder used for HIP were 65 μm ( Fig. 2 (a) ) and 40 μm ( Fig. 2 (b)), respectively. The powder was encapsulated in stainless steel capsules, and then HIP was conducted in a single stage at the temperature of 1200 °C and the pressure of 120 MPa. The optical micrographs of the specimens prepared by PREP powder and AA powder are shown in Fig. 3 (a) and (b), respectively. Table 2 shows the heat treatment time for different kinds of the specimens. In the table, the preparation technologies for different specimens were represented by the characters as follows: PREP-3h, PREP-5h, AA-3h and AA-5h, respectively. The cylindrical specimens of 8 mm diameter and 15 mm height were machined for hot compression testing. During machining, it was ensured that the edges of the specimens were chamfered to avoid fold-over in the initial stages of compression. In order to reduce friction, concentric grooves were provided on the faces of the specimens to ensure effective lubrication during compression. A computer controlled servo-hydraulic thermecmaster-Z machine was used for hot compression tests. This machine was equipped with an exponential decay of the actuator speed so that constant true strain rates in the range from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 could be imposed on the specimens. The specimens were induction heated to the test temperatures at a heating rate of 15 °C/s and held for 5 min to ensure temperature uniformity prior to deformation. Hot compression experiments were conducted under isothermal condition in the deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1100 °C and the strain rate range from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 . During deformation, the temperature was controlled within ±2 °C. All of the specimens were deformed to the true strains of 0.5 and 0.7, and cooled to room temperature immediately. The flow stress in the isothermal compression of PREP-3h, PREP-5h, AA-3h and AA-5h as a function of strain rate and deformation temperature is given in Tables 3–6 , respectively. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Stress–strain behavior A series of stress–strain curves of the P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96 deformed in the deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1100 °C and the strain rate range from 0.001 s −1 to 1 s −1 are shown in Fig. 4 (a)–(d) . The figures show that the flow stresses exhibit single peaks at certain strains and then gradually decrease or even keep constant at the high strain zone. Initial fast increase in stress is associated with an increasing in dislocation density and the formation of poorly developed sub-grain boundaries, as a result of working hardening and DRV. For the P/M nickel-base superalloy, the dislocations piled up and tangled around strengthening phase γ ’ may more easily lead to the increasing stress. However, with the further increase of strain, high dislocation density may stimulate the occurrence of DRX once a critical strain is exceeded. Fig. 4 (a)–(d) shows that all of the specimens exhibit continuous flow softening phenomenon after peaks, which may be associated with DRX. Compared with the specimen AA-5h, the specimen PREP-3h exhibits higher flow stress at lower temperatures (<1050 °C). However, the difference among the flow stresses of the different specimens gradually reduced with the increase of deformation temperature ( Fig. 4 (b)–(d)). This indicates that their deformation behaviors tend to be uniform at higher temperatures (>1050 °C). Liu et al. [22] investigated the hot deformation behavior of strengthening phase γ ’ and pointed out that the solution temperature of the phase fluctuated in a temperature range from 1088 °C to 1125 °C. So, the identical deformation behavior in high temperature may be associated with the decreasing volume fraction of strengthening phase γ ’ . Moreover, Fig. 4 (b) shows that the flow stresses exhibit the same slight uptrend in the steady-state stage at the temperature of 1100 °C, and the specimens PREP-5h and AA-5h exhibit higher flow stresses. This may be related to the interaction of potentially mobile dislocations with other dislocations, grain boundaries, or the periodic friction of the lattice itself which determines the rate flow. 3.2 Effects of temperature and strain rate on peak stress Since continuous flow softening after peaks is associated with DRX, the value of peak stress represents the threshold value of energy used for DRX in a sense. The Fig. 5 (a) shows the curves of deformation temperature vs. peak stress at the strain rate of 0.1 s −1 . The curves of that at other strain rates are essentially similar. The curves became dispersive at lower temperatures (<1050 °C). This is because that dislocation density, grain boundaries (GBs), strengthening phase γ ’ (Ni 3 (Al,Ti)) and grain sizes significantly affect the hot deformation behavior of the nickel-base superalloy at lower temperatures. For the P/M nickel-base superalloy, preparation technology determines the dislocation density and grain size of the initial microstructure. So, it can be seen that the effect of preparation technology on DRX is significant at lower temperatures. However, owing to the increasing thermal diffusion of metal atom and the decreasing volume fraction of strengthening phase γ ’ , the effect is weakened with the increase of deformation temperature. At the temperature of 1100 °C, the overlapped curves indicate that the specimens have the identical deformation mechanism. The curves of strain rate vs. peak stress at the deformation temperature of 1000 °C are shown in Fig. 5 (b). The curves of that at other temperatures are essentially similar. It can be seen that the curves overlap at the strain rate of 0.001 s −1 and disperse at higher strains (>0.1 s −1 ). This indicates that the effect of preparation technology on peak stress is slight at lower strain rates because DRV is dominant and makes dislocation density lower. However, with the increase of strain rate, the increasing dislocation density leads to the strengthened interaction of dislocations although this may stimulate the occurrence of DRX. Thus, it can be seen that the effect of preparation technology on DRX is significant at higher strain rates (>0.1 s −1 ). Moreover, Fig. 5 (a) and (b) show that the peak stress of specimen PREP-3h exhibits higher sensitivity to deformation temperature and strain rate. This indicates the variations of dislocation density of specimen PREP-3h with temperature and strain rate are prominent. On the basis of above analysis, it can be seen that the effects of strain rate and temperature on the hot deformation behavior of various specimens are different. It is known that DRX, flow instability and cracking may be also shown flown soften behavior. So, it is not very appropriate to predict the deformation mechanism on the basis of the shapes of the flow curves alone, although they may be correlated with the mechanisms established by other methods. 3.3 Processing maps The domains of the processing maps could be interpreted based on the characteristic efficiency variation associated with the microstructural processes [23–25] . The deformation mechanisms of the safe domains include DRV, DRX and superplasticity. In fact, DRX was shown to be more efficient process to keep the flow stresses and rates of work hardening considerably low [26] , which is thought to be a preferred choice for hot working. Generally, the efficiency values associated with DRX are about 30–50%, while the values relate to superplasticity are higher [27,28] . Moreover, the EPD by cracking processes is also generally very high since the energy conversion into surface energy is most efficient [29] . 3.3.1 PREP-3h The processing maps at other strains are essentially similar, so Fig. 6 (a) shows the map obtained at the strain of 0.6. High EPD occurs in the deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1020 °C and the strain rate range from 0.1 s −1 to 1 s −1 . In this domain, the efficiency steeply increases with the increase of strain rate and decrease of temperature. Such a feature has been observed to be typical of a fracture process in several materials [30,31] . In the deformation temperature range from 1030 °C to 1080 °C, the EPD is sensitive to strain rate and respectively reaches the minimum at the strain rates of 0.001 s −1 and 1 s −1 . This indicates that the occurrence of DRX is insufficient in these domains. Fig. 7 (a) shows the microstructure of the specimen deformed at the temperature of 1050 °C and the strain rate of 0.1 s −1 at the strain of 0.7. It can be seen that the PPBs are annihilated, and the fine recrystallized grains generated at high-angle grain boundaries. However, many micro dark carbide particles centralized at GBs may cause instability. Fig. 6 (a) shows that an instability domain lies in the deformation temperature range from 1020 °C to 1090 °C and the strain rate range from 1 × 10 −0.75 s −1 to 1 s −1 at the strain of 0.6. With the increase of strain, the instability domain gradually increases. Combined with Figs. 2 and 3 , because the specimen PREP-3h is more sensitive to strain rate and temperature, the strain rate should be strictly controlled during hot deformation when temperature is higher than 1030 °C. 3.3.2 PREP-5h The processing map of specimen PREP-5h at the strain of 0.6 is just shown in Fig. 6 (b) owing to less effect of strain on power dissipation. It can be seen that the EPD is higher at the temperature of 1000 °C, but it gradually decreases with the increasing temperature. At the temperature of 1030 °C, the EPD decreases to 33%. This indicates that the interaction of dislocations may stimulate the occurrence of DRX and result in the high efficiency of DRX at lower temperatures. With the increase of temperature, the decreasing volume fraction of strengthening phase γ ’ leads dislocation density to decrease. Thus, it can be seen that power dissipation is significantly affected by deformation temperature at lower temperatures (<1030 °C). Moreover, the map exhibits a triangle plateau in the temperature range from 1030 °C to 1060 °C and the strain rate range from 0.01 s −1 to 0.1 s −1 . According to the relation between EDP and DRX, the dislocation density is approximately a constant in this domain. However, at temperatures beyond about 1060 °C, Fig. 6 (b) shows that the EPD is more sensitive to strain rate and the variation of EDP with strain rate is obvious. At the deformation temperature of 1100 °C, there are two lower power dissipation domains in the strain rate ranges from 1 × 10 −0.5 s −1 to 1 s −1 and from 1 × 10 −3 s −1 to 1 × 10 −2.5 s −1 . The instability domain of specimen PREP-5h mainly lies in the strain rate range from 0.1 s −1 to 1 s −1 where EPD is lower and sensitive to strain rate. Correspondingly, Fig. 4 (b) shows that specimen PREP-5h exhibits higher flow stress in the steady-state stage. Thus, this instability may be associated with flow localization and cracking caused by low efficiency of DRX and DRV. Moreover, Fig. 7 (b) shows the microstructure of the specimen deformed at the deformation temperature of 1050 °C and the strain rate of 0.01 s −1 at the strain of 0.7. The recrystallized grain boundaries become serrated as a result of subgrain boundary formation. According to above analysis, the optimum condition of specimen PREP-5h is in the temperature range from 1020 °C to 1060 °C and the strain rate range from 0.01 s −1 to 0.1 s −1 . 3.3.3 AA-3h The processing maps of specimen AA-3h deformed at the strains of 0.4 and 0.6 are shown in Fig. 8 (a) and (b) . It can be see that the effect of strain on EPD is significant. At the strain of 0.4, the high power dissipation domains are as follows: (a) deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1050 °C and strain rate range from 1 × 10 −2.5 s −1 to 1 × 10 −0.75 s −1 ; (b) deformation temperature range from 1080 °C to 1100 °C and strain rate range from 0.001 s −1 to 0.01 s −1 ; (c) deformation temperature range from 1080 °C to 1100 °C and strain rate range from 0.1 s −1 to 1 s −1 . The peak of EPD increases with the increase of strain and reaches to 50% which indicates the superplastic may occur. Fig. 9 (a) shows the microstructure of the specimen deformed at the deformation temperature of 1050 °C and the strain rate of 0.1 s −1 . It can be seen that the recrystallized grains are uniform. The black precipitates are uniformly dispersed in grains, which may pin GBs and dislocations to keep the size of recrystallized grains small. The variation of power dissipation with strain rate is steeply in the domains as follows: (a) deformation temperature range from 1010 °C to 1060 °C and strain rate range from 1 × 10 −0.5 s −1 to 1 s −1 ; (b) deformation temperature range from 1080 °C to 1100 °C and strain rate range from 1 × 10 −2.5 s −1 to 1 × 10 −1.5 s −1 . In these domains, the unstable microstructure may be generated. Compared Fig. 8 (a) with (b), it can be seen that the instability domain increases with the increasing of strain. This indicates that the effect of strain on instability domains is significant. Thus, the optimum condition for specimen AA-3h is in the deformation temperature range from 1020 °C to 1060 °C and the strain rate range from 1 × 10 −2.5 s −1 to 1 × 10 −1 s −1 . 3.3.4 AA-5h The variation of EPD with strain rates and deformation temperatures at the strain of 0.3 is shown in Fig. 8 (c). The processing maps obtained at other strains are essentially similar. It can be seen that the map exists two high power dissipation domains at lower temperatures (<1030 °C), where the value of EPD is close to 59%. However, the EPD gradually decreases with the increase of temperature. It can be seen that the EPD decreases to 28% at the temperature of 1100 °C and the strain rates of 0.001 s −1 and 1 s −1 . Thus, the microstructure evolution is difficult to occur at higher temperatures (>1070 °C) except in the strain rate range from 1 × 10 −2.25 s −1 to 1 × 10 −0.5 s −1 , where the EPD increases to 38%. Fig. 9 (b) shows the microstructure of the specimen deformed at the deformation temperature of 1100 °C and the strain rate of 0.01 s −1 . The recrystallized grains coarsened (average grain size is about 42.5 μm) and the grain boundaries became serrated. Moreover, Fig. 8 (c) shows that two instability domains simultaneously existing at the strain of 0.3 are as follows: (a) deformation temperature range from 1000 °C to 1028 °C and strain rate range from 1 × 10 −2.6 s −1 to 1 × 10 −1.7 s −1 ; (b) deformation temperature range from 1078 °C to 1100 °C and strain rate range from 1 × 10 −0.5 s −1 to 1 s −1 . On the basis of above analysis, the processing windows for the specimens prepared by different preparation technologies are shown in Table 7 . 3.4 Effects of activation energy With a view to identify the rate controlling process during deformation, activation analysis is conducted using the kinetic rate equation, which relates the flow stress ( σ ) to temperature ( T ) and strain rate ( ε ˙ ) by: (5) ε ˙ = A σ n exp − Q R T where A is a frequency factor, n is the stress exponent, Q is the activation energy, R is the gas constant. On the basis of the stress exponent and activation energy values, the deformation mechanisms for microstructure development during hot working are identified. For this model, the flow stress data at various temperatures and strain rates at strains of 0.1 and 0.6 have been used. For specimen PREP-3h, the variation of flow stress with strain rate at different temperatures is shown in Fig. 10 (a) on a log–log scale. Linear statistical regression methods are used to determine the value of n . A liner fit with a good correlation factor could be obtained at the temperature of 1100 °C while deviations occurred at other temperatures especially at the strain rate of 0.01 s −1 . According to Eq. (7) , the value of n is obtained by inversing the slope of the line. It can be seen that the value of n is strain rate and temperature dependent. In this paper, this dependence is neglected by averaging the values of n . The average values of n for the specimens prepared by different preparation technologies are shown in Table 8 . Arrhenius plot showing the variation of flow stress with inverse of temperature on a semi-log scale is given in Fig. 10 (b). The activation energy values were obtained from the figure and are reported in Table 8 . It is well accepted that the climb of dislocations, DRV and DRX are related with activation energy, which can reflect the deformation behavior of materials [32] . Generally, the materials exhibiting high activation energy during deformation present bad workability owing to high deformation resistance caused by the increase of dislocation density. However, the occurrence of DRX can decrease the dislocation density and lead to lower flow stress. Table 8 shows that the activation energies at the strain of 0.1 are obviously higher than those at the strain of 0.6, indicating that the effect of strain on activation energy is significant. The activation energy of specimen PREP-3h is 266.66 kJ/mol at the strain of 0.1, which is close to that for lattice diffusion in pure nickel (278.2 kJ/mol) [33] . Thus, most of the dislocations may be hindered by grains and lead to the increase of activation energy in a sense. Although the activation energy decreases with the increase of strain, the value is still higher than the activation energy for grain boundary diffusion (118.2 kJ/mol) at the strain of 0.6 [34] . So, the dislocation movements mainly occur at GBs when the flow stress reaches a steady-state value, which is a typical DRX process. Further, it is well known that recrystallized grains nucleating and growing are a process of energy dissipation. This means that DRX is difficult to occur if activation energy is higher during deformation. High activation energy also makes the mobility of dislocation decrease and result in instability phenomenon [35] . Table 8 shows that specimen PREP-3h exhibits higher activation energy at the strain of 0.6. By comparing, it can be seen that the activation energy of specimen PREP-5h is obviously lower. This indicates that to prolongate the heat treatment time can decrease the dislocation density and cause lower activation energy which is good for workability. Moreover, it can be seen that the specimens prepared by AA also exhibit lower activation energy. This may be associated with non-uniform PPBs after HIP ( Fig. 3 (b)). The dislocations may easily shift across these PPBs owing to insufficient lattice energy to block the slip of dislocations. 3.5 DRX analysis An obvious Z effect on the microstructure of deformed nickel-base superalloy has been demonstrated: finer grains are formed in deformation with higher Z values, which can be understood from the grain refinement mechanism induced by plastic deformation [36] . It is known that the relation between dynamic recrystallized grain size and Zener–Hollomon parameter is described by: (6) D DRX = K Z A − n where D DRX is the size of recrystallized grains, Z is Zener–Hollomon parameter, K , n and A are constants related to material. According to Eq. (6) , the sizes of the recrystallized grains are in inverse proportion to the parameter Z . Further, it is known that an increase in strain rate during deformation is thought to have an equivalent effect to that of a decrease in deformation temperature and vice versa. The combined effects of strain rate and deformation temperature are often represented by Zener–Hollomon parameter, as defined by: (7) Z = ε ˙ exp Q R T where R is the gas constant, Q is the related activation energy for deformation (J/mol), ε ˙ is the strain rate (s −1 ), T is the deformation temperature (K). For specimen PREP-3h, the curves of Zener–Hollomon parameter vs. the flow stress is shown in Fig. 11 . This plot shows a good linear correlation between the flow stress and the Z value. The regression coefficient R 2 was 0.91. It implies that within the experimental condition, the power law relationship for hot deformation is obeyed. By means of linear statistical regression methods, the average values of parameter Z for the specimens prepared by different preparation technologies are obtained, as shown in Table 9 . It can be seen specimen PREP-3h exhibits higher Z value in steady-state stage, which indicates that the finer recrystallized grains may be generated during deformation. The corresponding microscopy shows that fine recrystallized grains exit at high-angle GBs during deformation ( Fig. 7 (a)). But according to previous analysis, the microstructure of specimen PREP-3h may exhibit instability during deformation owing to the high activation energy and more sensitivity to temperature and strain rate. In this paper, heat treatment time was increased to 5 h in order to decrease the activation energy of the specimens. However, the results show that Z value also decreased with the increase of heat treatment time although the dislocation density and the quantity of precipitation phase decreased, and this may cause grain coarsening during deformation ( Fig. 7 (b)). Thus, the weight may be balanced between workability and strength request. Moreover, by comparing, the specimens prepared by AA powder exhibit a better workability during hot working. But, to prolongate heat treatment time made their recrystallized grains coarsening severely ( Fig. 9 (b)). Based on the above-mentioned analysis, the heat treatment time of the specimens prepared by AA powder should be appropriately shortened. 4 Conclusion 1. The relationships among peak stress, deformation temperature and strain rate indicate that preparation technology significantly influences the hot deformation behavior of the specimens at higher strain rates (>0.1 s −1 ) or lower temperatures (<1050 °C). The P/M nickel-base superalloy prepared by PREP powder exhibit higher flow stresses at lower temperatures (<1050 °C), and the peak stress of specimen PREP-3h significantly increases with increasing strain rate and decreasing temperature. This may be related to its higher activation energy, uniform PPBs and the higher dislocation density. However, the effects of preparation technologies gradually decrease with the decrease of strain rate or the increase of temperature. 2. Compared with specimen AA-3h, the effect of strain on processing maps is slight for specimens PREP-3h and PREP-5h. At higher strain rates (>0.1 s −1 ), the instability may occur in domains where EPD is lower than 30%. The instability domains at higher strain rates (>0.1 s −1 ) may be related to adiabatic heating which can cause the flow localization and cracking, and those at higher temperatures (>1080 °C) and lower strain rates (<0.01 s −1 ) may be associated with the wedge cracking. Moreover, the micrograph of specimen PREP-3h deformed at the deformation temperature of 1050 °C and the strain rate of 0.1 s −1 shows that most of the precipitation phases concentrate at GBs, which easily lead to instability. 3. Generally, activation energy is close related to dislocation density and the interaction of dislocations may cause increasing deformation resistance. Since the GBs are less hard than the matrix and strengthening phase γ ’ , the stress concentrations may be relieved if the softening rate of grain boundary exceeds the stress accumulation rate at the GBs. Otherwise cracks or pores are expected to nucleate at the GBs. Thus, it can be seen that high activation energy is not good for hot working. By comparing, specimen AA-3h exhibits lower activation energy than specimen PREP-3h during deformation. This may be associated with non-uniform PPBs after HIP. Moreover, the effect of heat treatment time on activation energy is significant, so activation energy can be obviously decreased by prolongating heat treatment time. 4. It is accepted that the sizes of recrystallized grains are related to Zener–Hollomon parameter. Owing to higher Z value, specimen PREP-3h may generate finer recrystallized grains during deformation. The micrograph of specimen PREP-5h shows that the GBs are serration and the recrystallized grains are coarsening. Thus, the weight must be considered between heat treatment time and strength request. Furthermore, both of specimens AA-3h and AA-5h exhibit lower Z values. In order to prevent recrystallized grains coarsening, the heat treatment time of the specimens prepared by AA powder should be appropriately shortened. References [1] Y.H. Liu F.G. Li S.C. Wu Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. Chinese 24 2003 278 [2] M.J. Zhang F.G. Li S.Y. Wang C.Y. Liu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 6771 6779 [3] Y.Q. Ning Z.K. Yao H.Z. Guo H. Li T. Yu Y.W. Zhang Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 961 966 [4] G.J. Reddy N. Srinivasan A.A. Gokhale B.P. Kashyap J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 2009 5964 [5] H.Y. Kim H.C. Kwon H.W. Lee Y.T. Im S.M. Byon H.D. Park J. Mater. Process. Technol. 205 2008 70 [6] Z. Gronostajski J. Mater. Process. Technol 125–126 2002 119 [7] S. Venugopal P.V. Sivaprasad M. Vasudevan S.L. Mannan S.K. Jha P. Pandey Y.V.R.K. Prasad J. Mater. Process. Technol. 59 1995 343 [8] V.G. Krishna Y.V.R.K. Prasad N.C. Birla G.S. Rao J. Mater. Process. Technol. 71 1997 377 [9] Y. Liu R. Hu J.S. Li H.C. Kou H.W. Li H. Chang H.Z. Fu J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 2009 4020 [10] D.Y. Cai L.Y. Xiong W.C. Liu G.D. Sun M. Yao Mater. Charact. 58 2007 941 [11] K.L. Wang S.Q. Lu M.W. Fu X. Li X.J. Dong Mater. Charact. 60 2009 492 [12] Y.V.R.K. Prasad H.L. Gegel S.M. Doraivelu J.C. Malas J.T. Morgan K.A. Lark D.R. Barker Metall. Trans. A 15 1984 1883 [13] H.L. Gegel J.C. Malas S.M. Doraivelu V.A. Shende Forming and Forging vol. 14 1988 ASM International Ohio [14] M.C. Somani K. Muraleedharan Y.V.R.K. Prasad V. Singh Mater. Sci. Eng. A 245 1998 88 [15] M.C. Somani N.C. Birla Y.V.R.K. Prasad V. Singh J. Mater. Process. Technol. 52 1995 225 [16] Y.V.R.K. Prasad T. Seshacharyulu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 243 1998 82 [17] J. Luo M.Q. Li W.X. Yu H. Li Mater. Sci. Eng. A 504 2009 90 [18] Y.V.R.K. Prasad S. Sasidhara Hot Working Guide: A Compendium of Processing Maps 1997 ASM International Materials Park, OH Mater. Inform. Soc. [19] S.V.S.N. Murty B.N. Rao B.P. Kashyap J. Mater. Process. Technol. 166 2005 268 [20] H.J. Frost M.F. Ashby The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics 1982 Pergamon Press London [21] R. Raj Metall. Trans. A 12 1981 1089 [22] J.T. Liu G.Q. Liu B.F. Hu Y.P. Song Z.R. Qing S. Xiang Y.W. Zhang Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 35 2006 418 422 [23] N. Srinivasan Y.V.R.K. Prasad Metall. Trans 25A 1994 2275 2284 [24] S.C. Medeiros Y.V.R.K. Prasad W.G. Frazier R. Srinivasan Mater. Sci. Eng. A 293 2000 198 207 [25] G. Ganesan K. Raghukandan R. Karthikeyan B.C. Pai Mater. Sci. Eng. A 369 2004 230 235 [26] O. Sivakesavam I.S. Rao Y.V.R.K. Prasad Mater. Sci. Technol. 9 1993 805 810 [27] N. Srinivasan Y.V.R.K. Prasad Mater. Sci. Technol. 8 1992 206 212 [28] N. Ravichandran Y.V.R.K. Prasad Mater. Sci. Eng. A 156 1992 195 204 [29] Y. Ning Z. Yao M.W. Fu H. Guo Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 6968 6974 [30] Y.V.R.K. Prasad S. Sasidhara Hot Working Guide: A Compendium of Processing Maps 1997 ASM International Materials Park, OH [31] T. Seshacharyulu S.C. Medeiros W.G. Frazier Y.V.R.K. Prasad Mater. Sci. Eng. A 325 2002 112 125 [32] H.J. McQueen Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387–389 2004 203 208 [33] E.A. Brandes Smithells Metals Reference Book 6th ed. 1983 Butterworths London [34] I. Kaur, W. Gust, L. Kozma, Handbook of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion Data, vol. 1, pp. 523 and vol. 2, pp. 1066, Ziegler Press, Stuttgart, 1989. [35] J.C. Malas S. Venugopal T. Seshacharyulu Mater. Sci. Eng. A 368 2004 41 47 [36] Y.Q. Ning Z.K. Yao H.Z. Guo M.W. Fu H. Li X.H. Xie Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 6794 6799

Investigation on hot deformation behavior of P/M Ni-base superalloy FGH96 by using processing maps

Study on Hot Deformation Behavior of P/M Superalloy Using Processing Map

Investigation on Hot Deformation Behavior of P/M Superalloy FGH4096

Hot Deformation Behavior and Hot Processing Map of GH2907 Superalloy

Deformation Behavior and Processing Maps of Ni3Al-based Superalloy During Isothermal Hot Compression

Hot deformation behavior of a new type nickel-based P/M superalloy

High Temperature Deformation Behavior of Hot Isostatically Pressed P/M FGH4096 Superalloy

Characterization of Hot Deformation Behavior of a P/M Nickel-Base Superalloy Using Processing Map and Activation Energy

Characterization of Hot Deformation Behavior of a New Ni–Cr–Co Based P/M Superalloy

Characterization of hot compression behavior of a new HIPed nickel-based P/M superalloy using processing maps

Hot Deformation Behavior and Processing Map of a Nickel-Base Superalloy GH4169

Hot Deformation Behavior and Processing Map of a Γ′-Hardened Nickel-Based Superalloy

Effect of processing parameters on hot compressive deformation behavior of a new Ni–Cr–Co based P/M superalloy

Hot Working Behavior Of Hot-Extruded Ni-Co-Cr-Based Powder Metallurgy Superalloy

Hot Compressive Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of HIPed FGH96 Superalloy

Failure behaviors and processing maps with failure domains for hot compression of a powder metallurgy Ni-based superalloy

Effect of powder preparation technology on the hot deformation behavior of HIPed P/M nickel-base superalloy FGH96

Hot Deformation of Spray Formed Nickel-Base Superalloy Using Processing Maps

Hot Deformation Behavior and Processing Map of a Powder Metallurgy Ti–22Al–25Nb Alloy

Determining Processing Maps of FGH96 Superalloy

Hot working characteristics of HEXed PM nickel-based superalloy during hot compression