Relationship between Offence of Rape and Whoring with Girls under 14

Che Hao
2010-01-01
Abstract:With regard to the relationship between the rape offence and whoring with girls under 14,there are several different theoretical viewpoints in criminal law.The basic perspective in this thesis agrees that,from the view of law interpretation,the above-mentioned relationship is mutually exclusive.This is determined by the different basic elements of the two crimes.Lack of valid consent is the constitutive element of rape offence,while provided with valid consent is the key element of the latter one.In case with the consent of the girl under 14,the object of the rape offence is only the young girl who does not have the ability to consent.To the contrary,the object of whoring with young girl is the young girl who has such ability.As a consent cannot be both valid and invalid,only one characterization can be selected between these two crimes which cannot be concurrent.In addition,standing on the point of legal criticism,the second opinion can also be acceptable by demonstrating the necessity of law amendment from the perspectives of articles concurrence and unordered settings of criminal penalty. It cannot be accepted to interpret these two crimes as articles concurrence and further affirm the principle of "heavier article is superior to lighter one".According to this view,when the interpreter thinks that the punishment does not suit the crime,this principle should be applied in conviction and sentencing.However,applying the weight article without clear provision by law shows a false cognition in the nature of punishment right and is actually utilizing the legislative power in the name of interpretation. In addition,this article is also not in favor that the two crimes are imaginative coincidental offence so that the severe punishment should be applied.Even if people acknowledge that the two crimes are concurrent,such concurrence can only be constant and necessary,so it can not be imaginative coincidental at all but articles concurrence only.Furthermore,the allegation of fully utilizing the imaginative coincidental offence is not suitable for current national conditions.It is likely to be abused without limitation in prevailing judicial environments,and works as a foundation for severe cracking down on crime or an excuse to cover up questionable points for conviction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?