Evaluation the changes of cTNI,CK-MB and MYO after atrial fibrillation radiofrequency cathether ablation

Liu changgang,Zhao xiaochun,Li xuebin,Zhang ping,Guo jihong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0272.2009.05.006
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To estimate the value changes of cTNI,CK-MB and MYO after atrial fibrillation radiofrequency cathether ablation,and to investigate the degree of myocardial injury incurred by RFCA. Methods In 20 patients undergoing RFCA using Carto system for atrial fibrillation,cTNI,CK-MB and MYO levels were measured before,and 4~5h after RFCA. Results There were uncomplicated in 20 patients. Baseline cTNI levels which had no CFAE ablation averaged(0.05±0.03)ng/ml ,rose to(0.38±0.27)ng/ml at 4~5h after RFCA(p=0.002),Baseline CK-MB levels averaged (0.86±0.37)ng/ml,roseto (1.6±0.88)ng/mlat4~5h after RFCA(p<0.05,p=0.016),Baseline MYO levels averaged(41.8±17.5)ng/ml ,rose to(121.8±65.8)ng/ml at 4~5h after RFCA(p<0.05,p=0.001). There were all significant differences between them.The Baseline cTNI levels which had CFAE ablation averaged (0.07±0.05)ng/ml ,roseto(1.83±1.66)ng/ml at4~5h after RFCA(p=0.03),Baseline CK-MB levels averaged(1.23±0.34)ng/ml,roseto (3.4±2.8)ng/mlat 4~5h after RFCA(p=0.096),There was no significant differences between them.Baseline MYO levels averaged (57.4±22.9)ng/ml ,rose to (130.1±53.4)ng/ml at 4~5h after RFCA (p=0.03). There were significant differences between them. But there was nosignificant differences between CFAE ablation or not. Conclusion The cTNI and MYO had significant differences between pre-ablation and after ablation. The CK-MB had significant differences between pre-ablation and after without CFAE ablation,but it had no significant differences with CFAE ablation.There was no significant difference between CFAE ablation or not. Sothe CFAE ablation had no harm to myocardium.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?