Comparison of Three Computer-Aid Shade Matching Instruments for Measuring Tooth Color

袁坤,陈吉华,孙翔,王辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6455.2010.03.034
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of three computer-aid shade matching instruments (Vita Easyshade,ShadeEye NCC and Shadepilot). Methods Color parameters of the maxillary right central incisors of 85 patients and five Vita Classical shade guides were measured with the three shade-matching instruments. L*a*b* values and shade matches to Vita Classical shade guide system were determined for all teeth. The CIELAB colorimetric system was used for the study to calculate the accurate tooth color that each instrument theoretically supposed to be displayed.Reliability and accuracy were then calculated for each instrument. Results When output in Vita Classical shade guide system,no significant difference was revealed between the accuracy of Vita Easyshade and ShadeEye NCC(P0.05),but both of these two instruments produced a significant lower accuracy than Shadepilot (P 0.001). The reliability of all the instruments were great,and there was no significant difference among them (P0.05). L*a*b values with the three shade-matching instruments were significant different (P0.01). Conclusion This in vivo study showed a varying degree of reliability,accuracy and L*a*b values for the three shade-matching instruments. Although all the three devices tested in the study had high shade matching reliability, only Shadepilot had both accuracy and reliability values greater than 75%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?