Abstract:Data‐driven models for seismic damage and loss assessment of buildings have become more common in recent years due to the availability of large repositories of recorded and synthetic ground motions coupled with structural response simulation data. This paper explores the benefits of using bivariate and multivariate fragility functions to estimate earthquake‐induced damage and economic loss in high‐rise buildings. The dataset used in this study encompasses 15,000 simulations of modern high‐rise reinforced concrete shear wall buildings ranging from eight to 24 stories which are subjected to ground motion records at five different intensity levels. The proposed functions are conditioned on average spectral accelerations and ground motion significant duration. The results indicate that bivariate fragility functions improve damage state prediction success (Brier score) by 16%, and multivariate fragility functions by 24% relative to conventional univariate functions (standard of practice). To develop multivariate functions, nominal and ordinal probit regression models are fit to the dataset. While both models yield satisfactory predictive performance, ordinal functions can lead to a 15% reduction in misclassified collapse instances, that is, the minority class. Univariate functions tend to overestimate seismic losses at lower intensity levels while underestimating them at higher intensities. These loss estimates are significantly improved when bivariate or multivariate building fragility functions are used. Given the increase in the use of physics‐based ground motion simulations and/or multi‐variate ground motion models, from which multiple intensity measures can be extracted, a shift toward a more complex representation of fragility functions, for example, multivariate curves, is necessary and inevitable. The proposed functions are used to evaluate the performance of a portfolio of modern high‐rise reinforced concrete shear wall buildings at four sites across the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area under a potential magnitude‐9 Cascadia subduction zone earthquake scenario. The results indicate that the proposed functions can be beneficial in enhancing damage state predictions and loss estimates at a regional scale.

Multidimensional Performance Limit State for Hazard Fragility Functions

Multi-Dimensional Fragility of Structures: Formulation and Evaluation

Global Fragility Evaluation of Health Care Facilities with Structural and Nonstructural Components

Multivariable fragility surfaces for earthquake-induced damage assessment of buildings integrating structural features

Fragility Based Life Cycle Loss Estimation Methodology for Critical Facilities

Simplified state‐dependent seismic fragility assessment

Multiple failure function based fragility curves for structures equipped with TMD

Fragility Analysis and Seismic Record Selection

Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage

Parameterized Coastal Fragilities and Their Application to Aging Port Structures Subjected to Surge and Wave

Fragility Curves of Restoration Processes for Resilience Analysis

Toward multivariate fragility functions for seismic damage and loss estimation of high‐rise buildings

Service-life multi-hazard risk assessment of structures: framework and application

Seismic fragility analysis using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions

Efficient seismic fragility analysis considering uncertainties in structural systems and ground motions

Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions

Fragility assessment and optimum design of a steel–concrete frame structure with hybrid energy-dissipated devices under multi-hazards of earthquake and wind

A Simplified Approach of Analytical Seismic Fragility Analysis Using the Endurance Time Method

Fragility functions for low‐damage post‐tensioned timber frames

Seismic fragility analysis of structures via an Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model and its application to resilience assessment

Hysteretic energy‐based state‐dependent fragility for ground‐motion sequences