Abstract:My ontological doctrine on information already specified that the existing structure of all the objects is a physically encoded form which contains information: the information field-assimilation and alienation of information-informosome,which is the logic of self movement of information.When the sense-perception occurs,there is an intermediary contact of energy field between subject and object,which is a basic fact.Our bodies' feeling is a phenomenon of sense of the macrography,and manner of the nervous system of us involves feeling,but only the process of micro-activities is achieved by nerve electrical pulse.Thus,they should have a conversion process from macrography to the microcosmic between our perception of macro things and the micro-electrical pulse of nervous system activity,and this conversion process can only be realized by the macro-things that accrue the micro-energy field as intermediary.The subject is man,not as a purely subjectivity existence.Subject and object by interaction of intermediary would inevitably lead to mutual change.Human knowledge must rely on external information on the subject role of the senses,whether external information is an active role in the human senses,or through human intervention and development before acting on the human senses.Material and information each has its own quality and quantity,contemporary information science and the philosophy of information raise quality of information,making the division and the calculation of the amount of information.It does not mean abolishing material quality and quantity,on the overhead and canceled substances.The building of Cognitive phylogeny and individual cognition structure must be condensed of information as the intermediary,which is the scientific fact of the contemporary life sciences and cognitive science that is revealed.We use process of information to explain that practice does not mean that the use of information replaces practice,as with the material processes to explain the practice;it does not mean to replace practice by using the same material.

Critique of Critical Logic in Mr.Huo Youguang's Paper “query about Mr.Wu Kun's ‘information Theory of Value'”

Counter-criticism on Mr.Huo Youguang's Paper "mr.wu Kun ‘epistemological of Information' Query"

On Information Production and Information Productivity——Counter-criticism of Mr.Huo Youguang’s Query

Discussed Again to Some Issue of the Philosophy of Information——Discussion Again with Mr.Huo Youguang

A Text Counter Criticism for Then Questioned of "Objective Information" Category

Interaction and Dual Evolution of Material and Information：A Counter-criticism to Mr.Huo Youguang’ S Query

A logical analysis of the debate on Hao River

Discussion on Several Issues Related to Philosophy of Information——Re-challenge the Validity of Mr. Huo Youguang's Query

May Logical Truth be False?——Refute One Kind of False Viewpoints and Understanding

A Naturalist's Unnatural Criticism——On Quine's Rationality of Critiquing Distinction Between Analytic and Synthetic Statements

The Chinese philosophy of information by Kun Wu

The Constructive Approach of Informational Ontology and the Transform of Philosophical Notion——The Comparison to the Philosophy of Information of Simondon and WU Kun

Understanding,Critique and Constitution

Thinking of the Information Structure and Holographic Theory in the Ancient Chinese Philosophy

Critique of Knowledge:One Part of Zhuangzi's Philosophy

The Idea of Information Epistemology Embodied by Discussing About the Relations of Name and Object,Saying,Presentation and Meaning in Ancient Chinese Philosophy

Some Problems and Analyses on Qi Wu Lun of ZhuangZi

A Clarification of Quine's Critique on Dichotomy between the Analytic and the Synthetic

An Elucidation of Hui Shi’s Argument for "Unifying Similarity and Difference"

The Possibility of Rational Discussion in the Value Domain

Criticism of Logics