Abstract:Aims and objectives. To explore which sociodemographic and clinical factors could interfere in the parameters of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and determine the affecting factors of Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index.Background. Although the clinical relevance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index have been studied, the explanation of their role and related interfering factors remains controversial in patients with different disease or age, etc.Design. Cross‐sectional study.Methods. The study was carried out between October 2008–October 2009. A convenience sample of hypertensive patients over 60 years old was recruited in China. Twenty‐four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was carried out on the non‐dominant arm using an oscillometric device.Results. (1) All 95 patients completed the study and their ages ranged from 60–76 years. (2) There were statistical differences for certain parameters of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring between different characteristics of patients. Financial status was an important factor interfering in patients’ BP fluctuation, especially daytime and 24 hours systolic pressure. The higher body mass index the patients had, the higher the pressure was. (3) Multiple variants logistic analysis of Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index showed statistical differences only in coefficient variation of 24‐hour diastolic pressure and daytime systolic blood pressure.Conclusions. There are more factors that interfered with systolic pressure and diastolic pressure during the day than nigh. Patients who have less nocturnal dipping may have a higher night time systolic pressure and diastolic pressure. The coefficient of variation of 24 hours diastolic pressure and daytime systolic pressure contribute more to Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index which should arouse practitioners’ attention.Relevance to clinical practice. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be used as a routine procedure, as well as Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index calculated for older hypertensive patients. The findings may be used to guide community health providers to pay more attention to the factors that may influence BP fluctuation and Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index according to individual’s characteristics.

Reproducibility of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in Hypertensive Patients

Determinants of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in 7604 Subjects from 6 Populations.

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Derived from 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

How Many Measurements Are Needed to Provide Reliable Information in Terms of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index? the Ohasama Study

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Correlates with Ambulatory Pulse Pressure but Not Dipping Status in Patients with Grade 1/grade 2 Essential Hypertension

Responses of the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index and Other Measures of Arterial Function to Antihypertensive Drugs.

Reproducibility of Non-invasive Arterial Stiffness Measurements in Healthy Adults

Correlating Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements with Arterial Stiffness: A Conceptual Inconsistency?

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Predicts Stroke in a General Population.

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index: Determinants and Outcome

Arterial Stiffness Estimation in Hypertension

The study of ambulatory arterial stiffness index in patients with coronary heart disease

[Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index and Associated Factors in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease].

The relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and incident atrial fibrillation

Telemetric Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index, a Predictor of Cardio-Cerebro-vascular Mortality, is Associated with Aortic Stiffness-Determining Factors.

Mean value of pulse pressure: The key feature in ambulatory arterial stiffness index estimation using regression models

Pivotal Factors Interfering in 24-Hour Blood Pressure Fluctuation and Arterial Stiffness in A Community of Chinese Elderly Hypertensive Patients

Comments on the Reproducibility of Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index and QRS Korotkoff Delay Index

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Ambulatory Central Artery Stiffness Index in Patients with Hypertension

Letter to the Editor: Response to Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Stiffness Parameter But a Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling Factor

Ambulatory arterial stiffness index, mortality, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes; Systematic review and meta‐analysis