Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the circadian blood pressure (BP) profile and its influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment. METHODS:Cross-sectional surveillance was carried out in essential hypertensive subjects after treatment whose clinic blood pressure had been under control as 140/90 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) for at least one month. All patients underwent a twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (spacelabs 90207). The nocturnal fall of blood pressure (BP) was calculated from (daytime mean BP-night-time mean BP)/daytime BP, while 'daytime' values were recorded between 6 h and 22 h and 'night-time' values between 22 h and 6 h. Non-dippers were defined as those whose nocturnal decrease in mean systolic BP and/or mean diastolic BP was < 10% of the daytime BP. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between circadian blood pressure profile and factors as gender, age, height, body mass index (BMI), family history of premature cardiovascular disease, women under age 65 or men under age 55, smoking habits, grade of hypertension, and strategy of antihypertensive drugs. RESULTS:208 treated essential hypertensive patients were enrolled in the study. 79 individuals were dippers and 129 were non-dippers. Data from logistic regression analysis showed that four factors as age, premature family history of cardiovascular disease, overweight or obesity, and strategy of antihypertensive drugs were significantly influencing the circadian blood pressure profile in treated hypertensive patients. The incidence of non-dippers in patients of 70 years of age or older and those between 60 and 69 were 3.3 and 2.3 times of those with less than 60 (P = 0.009 and 0.031, respectively). The prevalence of non-dippers in patients with a premature family history of cardiovascular disease was 3.7 times greater than those in subjects without a premature history of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.029). Similarly, the incidence of non-dippers in patients of overweight (24 = BMI < 28) and obesity (BMI >/= 28) were 3.0 and 4.8 times of those in subjects of normal weight (P = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Compared with patients treated with long-acting calcium channel blockers (CCBs), patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) alone had less prevalence of nondippers (OR = 0.139, P = 0.010). Patients treated with joint antihypertensive scheme including ACE inhibitors or ARBs(but not including diuretics) had the tendency of lower incidence of abnormal circadian blood pressure rhythm (OR = 0.453, P = 0.118). Patients treated with joint antihypertensive scheme including diuretics (not including ACE inhibitors or ARBs) and with joint antihypertensive strategy including diuretics and ACE inhibitors or ARBs had lower incidence of nondippers (OR = 0.378 and 0.273, respectively; P = 0.030 and 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Approximately 2/3 treated essential hypertensive patients had a non-dipper blood pressure profile. Age, premature family history of cardiovascular disease, overweight/obesity, and antihypertensive drugs strategy were correlated with circadian blood pressure profile. Compared with long-acting CCBs, diuretics, ACE inhibitors or ARBs might be helpful in keeping the circadian blood pressure rhythm at normal range.

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Correlates with Ambulatory Pulse Pressure but Not Dipping Status in Patients with Grade 1/grade 2 Essential Hypertension

ASSOCIATION OF AMBULATORY ARTERIAL STIFFNESS INDEX AND PULSE PRESSURE WITH GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN PRIMARY HYPERTENSION: PP.19.251

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Ambulatory Central Artery Stiffness Index in Patients with Hypertension

Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index is Associated with the Presence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease

The relationship between ambulatory arterial stiffness index and incident atrial fibrillation

[Association Between Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index with Left Ventricular Mass Index in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients].

Arterial Stiffness Estimation in Hypertension

Hypertension, Arterial Stiffness, and Clinical Outcomes: A Cohort Study of Chinese Community-Based Population

Mean value of pulse pressure: The key feature in ambulatory arterial stiffness index estimation using regression models

Ambulatory arterial stiffness index, mortality, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes; Systematic review and meta‐analysis

The Study of Aortic Stiffness in Different Hypertension Subtypes in Dialysis Patients

Profile on Circadian Blood Pressure and the Influencing Factors in Essential Hypertensive Patients after Treatment

Association of Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure With Left Atrial-Left Ventricular–Arterial Coupling in Hypertension

The Sensitivity of Augmentation Index and Pulse Way Velocity in Evaluation of Aortic Stiffness in Dialysis Patients

Hypertension, Arterial Stiffness, and Diabetes: a Prospective Cohort Study

Association Between Arterial Stiffness and Measures of Autonomic Dysfunction in People With Chronic Kidney Disease

Relations among Perceived Stress, Fatigue, and Sleepiness, and Their Effects on the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index in Medical Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sex modification of the association of the radial augmentation index and incident hypertension in a Chinese community-based population

Abstract P637: Blood Pressure Stability Has a Closer Relationship With Atherosclerosis Burden of Carotid Sinuses Than Atherosclerosis Burden of Aortic Arch

The study of aortic stiffness in different hypertension subtypes in patients with chronic kidney disease

Study on the Correlation between Variability and Arterial Stiffness