Comparison on perinatal medicine between the results of evidence based medicine and current practice in China

LUO Shu-Sheng,REN Zheng-Hong,WANG Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2006.17.067
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To find and abandon incorrect clinical practices on perinatal medicine in China, and to advocate the newest correct methods according to the results of evidence based medicine research in Cochrane library.Methods:To read all the systematic reviews finalized by Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group to gather those methods without evidence-supported benefit but with obvious harm that should be abandoned. And then to compare them with Chinese current practices to find incorrect methods still in use in China, by searching medical textbooks in the newest version and newly-published research literatures.Results:There were 11 systematic reviews concerning methods with no evidence-supported benefit but with obvious harm that should be abandoned, in which 8 methods were recommended by textbook or still in use in China today.Conclusion:Some medical textbooks in China today have the problem of up-to-date, and doctors should trace the newest research results to renew profession knowledge.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?