RFID adoption and its long-term impact on firm value: An empirical research based on global public companies
Jia-he JIN,Ming GUO,Xi CHEN,Wei-hua ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2018.01.026
2018-01-01
Abstract:In the era of the Intemet of things (IoT),RFID is expected to take over barcode technology at a great rate.The technology has been developing rapidly and penetrating into people's daily life.This innovative technology can greatly lower manufacturing cost,reduce the uncertainty caused by information asymmetry,integrate the supply chain,and increase operational efficiency.However,some existing challenges,such as huge initial investment,integration problem,and performance uncertainties,make firms hesitate to undertake this innovative technology project.Empirical evidence on the trade-offbetween RFID benefit and cost in short term is not consistent.IT,like RFID,contributes to performance dimensions,such as strategic flexibility and intangible value.RFID's value cannot be fully realized in a short time and short-term analysis will not identify the impact of RFID adoption adequately.Thus,a long-term observation is needed to investigate RFID's impact.We use monthly data of 89 companies which adopted RFID projects around the world from January 1997 to December 2011.In addition,we perform four years calendar portfolio analysis (CPA) and ROA comparison analysis to gain insights into the mechanism of RFID for improving firm performance.A critique of the management literature on event studies using long-term windows is that other events will naturally occur as the time window expands and will confound the effect of the event under study.In response to this issue,calendar portfolio analysis is used in this study to discover RFID's long term impact on firms' market value.The calendar portfolio analysis is conducted in two steps.The first step computes an average return for the specified calendar-time portfolio.The second step measures the risk-adjusted performance by estimating a multifactor time-series regression model.Since the samples in our study are both US listed and non-US listed,we adopt the merged Fama-French three factors model proposed by Bose et al.'s study.The estimator of model intercept provides a test of the null hypothesis that the abnormal return of the portfolio on the calendar-time portfolio is zero.In addition,we find that firms adopting RFID generally experience significant and negative abnormal market return over a long term.However,single indicator alone has its prerequisite and its insufficiency.In this paper,we employ Return-on-Assets (ROA) as the second measure of firm performance and use ROA comparative analysis to gain insights into the mechanism of RFID for firm performance.We find that the adoption of RFID has influence on ROA of firms over a long term.Industry type is believed to be an essential moderator of IT investment.We follow Bose et al.'s research and classify our samples into manufacturing and nonmanufacturing samples to investigate industry factors that moderate the long-term impact of RFID on the investment return of adopting firms.We find that manufactures that adopt RFID have lower and significant negative abnormal market return,in comparison with non-manufacture adopters.RFID adoption has no significant positive influence on ROA for manufacturers and non-manufacturers.Our results show that RFID may be helpful,but increase operational cost to firms which could hurt their market value and may also cancel the effect of profit growth based on ROA.For managers of manufacturers,extra caution is needed if they want to adopt RFID because those firms may face additional risk due to heavy operational cost and challenges in integrating IT and business.