Formation of Monoclinic Phase and Its Effect on the Superconductivity of 2212-Phase and 2223-Phase in the Bi-Based System

XL WANG,H WANG,MH JIANG,SX SHANG,Z WANG,SM DONG,WT YU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(91)90531-3
1991-01-01
Abstract:Samples with nominal composition Bi1.84Pb0.34Sb0.1Sr2Ca2Cu3Oy and Bi1.84Pb0.34Sr2Ca2CdxCu3 Oy were prepared by a direct sintering and air quenching technique. The measurement results of temperature dependences of the resistance, AC susceptibility and X-ray diffraction show that Sb-doped samples, sintered at 850°C for 76 h or for 100 h contain a monoclinic phase in addition to the 2212 and 2223 phases and if the monoclinic phase coexists with only the 2223 phase there is a kneww below the transition of 2223 phase in the resistance-temperature curve around 105 K; for a Cd-doped sample (x=0.1), although the monoclinic phase coexisted with the 2212 phase, the zero resistance temperature is up to 105 K; however, the data of the AC susceptibility of the sample indicated only one superconducting transition of 2212 phase around 80 K, and not any new superconducting transition above 100 K; furthermore, if the monoclinic phase is absent or its fraction is very small compared with 2223 or 2212 phase, the knee in the Sb-doped samples or the Tco of 105 K in the Cd-doped sample, respectively, would disappear. It is suggested that the monoclinic phase has the effect on the superconductivity of the 2212 phase or 2223 phase that the Tco of the 2212 phase can be raised, while the Tco of 2223 phase was decreased.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?