Abstract:An increasing number of universities in China have given monetary awards to their professors who successfully publish SCI papers since 1980s.When just implemented,the reward system was not differential because all professors received the same amount of monetary reward regardless of the quality of SCI papers to which they published.To motivate professors to publish high quality SCI papers,many universities modified the equal reward system into a differential reward system so that their professors who can publish papers to high impact factor SCI journals would receive a higher monetary reward than other professors.The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether such a differential reward system is effective at motivating professors in publishing more high impact factor SCI papers. Zhejiang University had experienced such a transformation in their reward systems for SCI paper publications from 1999-2005.Its past experiences give us a very good opportunity to investigate the relationship between different reward systems and SCI paper publication productivity of professors.Professors in Zhejiang University who published a paper in thetop-tier journal Nature or Science in 1999 would receive 70000 yuan or RMB.In contrast,professors publishing other SCI papers would receive 3500 yuan regardless of their quality,such as impact factor.The reward system was modified in 2003 so that professors publishing to Nature or Science would receive 40,000 yuan instead.In contrast,other SCI papers would receive different amounts of monetary rewards.For instance,the authors of SCI papers with impact factor higher than 3.0 would be given 6000 yuan and the other authors of other SCI papers would be given 3500 yuan.The monetary reward system continues to change in 2005.An author of the Nature or Science journal would be given 230,000 yuan.The paper which was published in SCI journal with impact factor less than 1.0,equal or higher than 1.0 but less than 3.0,equal or higher than 3.0 but less than 5.0,equal or higher than 5.0 but less than 10.0,equal or higher than 10.0,would be given 3,500,4,500,5,500,11,000,29,000 yuan,respectively.The paper which was published in top SCI journals in their discipline would be given 7000 yuan.The 2005 monetary reward system was a very significant change. How have professors of Zhejiang University responded to such changes to their monetary reward systems? A database about SCI paper publications of professors in Zhejiang University between 1998 and 2007 indicates that the quantity and percentage of higher impact factor SCI papers are substantially increased under the differential reward system.Our data analysis controls the potential impact of factors such as new faculty with stronger academic backgrounds.For example,the percentage of the SCI papers which were published in SCI journals with impact factor less than1.0 dropped from 53.42 to 53.77% in 2003-2005,to 47.78% in 2006 and 37.75% in 2007.Meanwhile,the percentage of top SCI journal papers increased from 23.16 to 25.55% in 2003-2005,to 27.71% in 2006 and to 34.03% in 2007.The average impact factor of each year's SCI papers has increased significantly after 2005.These results indicate the new reward system of Zhejiang University has a significantly positive effect on increasing professors' publication quality and quantity in SCI journals. Some suggestions are given to conclude this paper.Firstly,Zhejiang University's reward system has a common flaw,which neglects that the differential impact of the average impact factors of journals in different disciplines.Secondly,such reward system may not be necessary if an international peer review system is constructed.Thirdly,knowledge about academic integrity should be imparted across campus.Finally,the research should not be given so much monetary reward that balance of teaching,research and service cannot be maintained.

WHICH ACADEMIC JOURNALS DO SCIENTISTS PREFER?—As a Sample Sponsored by Special Grant for Key Academic Journals of NSFC—10 Years Viewing of J of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE(A/B/C)

How Far Does China Still Need to Go to Internationalize Her Academic Journals?

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Chinese Scientific Journals: How They Can Survive.

Keeping a Foothold at Universities:the Premise of Sustainable Development of Academic Journal

International Competitiveness Of Chinese Journals

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Opportunities and challenges for China's scientific journal publishing in the new era

Thoughts on Centennial of University Journals

An exploration into the development mode of Chinese academic journals: Taking Acta Optica Sinica as an example

Scientific Research Competitive Ability of Chinese Scholars from the Perspective of Two International Core Journals

Academic Journals In China: Past, Present And Future

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Opportunities, challenges, and countermeasures for China to develop world-class science and technology journals

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

The English-language Academic Journals of China: Trends and Developments.

Influence of international publishing group entering Chinese market on the development of English science journals published by Chinese universities

Reward System and Scholastic Achievement: the Incentive Effect of Increasing Rewards for High Impact Factor SCI Papers-Empirical Evidences from Zhejiang University

How to Evaluate Fairly the Basic Research in Life Sciences

Research Frontiers Highlighted in Science China Life Sciences in 2009

Analysis of factors affecting qualities of sci-tech academic journals