Abstract:There are two kinds of theories in inductive reasoning:the Similarity-Coverage Model(SCM,Osherson 1990) and the Feature-Based Induction Model(FBIM,Sloman 1993).They are based on the similarity between the base premise and the target premise.The SCM model of induction driven by two related notions,i.e.similarity and coverage,also assumes that judgments may be partially based on the similarity of the premise category to examples of the lowest level super-ordinate category that spans the premise and conclusion categories. Although parts of researchers think that FBIM relies on the notions of(feature) coverage,the central idea is that the similarity is driven by matching and mismatching features and that an argument is strong to the extent that the premise and conclusion categories share features.A distinctive property of FBIM is that it does not use category information in the sense that it does not consider different levels of categorization.Instead,it assumes that all categories are represented in terms of features and that strength of argument is based on feature overlap. Some researches suggest that a category label is just a specific feature of an item.Some find that category labels can be viewed as an integrator of information.This paper focused on whether upper-level category information affects inductive intension.By creating a story-reading paradigm,we used category labels to control upper-level category information to study the effects of category labels.We further explored the category information activated initiatively or passively. Three experiments were made to investigate the influence of feature similarity,category labels and uncertain category labels on inductive tension respectively.We adopted the One-Way-Within-Subjects design to implement the three experiments. Experiment 1 shows that people tend to choose features of high similarity between the base premise and the target premise in experiments.The result is consistent with the account of SCM and FBIM.Experiment 2 shows that people tend to choose features of category labels rather than features of high similarity.It suggests that a category label is not a specific features of an item.Experiment 3 shows that category information is activated initiatively.Even though replaced by uncertain labels,people still tend to choose features of category labels in the same way as in Experiment 2. The above results demonstrate that category labels tend to play an important role in inductive reasoning.Combining previous researches,we hypothesize that inductive intension relies on two quantities:feature similarity and categorization probability.

A Psychological Analysis and Solution for Validity of Inductive Reasoning

The Psychological Defense for the Rationality of Inductive Inference

The New Understanding of Validity Concept

Russell on Inductive Problem

Solving the Problem of Induction

On the Problem of the Rationality of Induction:Kant's Solution to Hume's Problem and an Improvement to It

The Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Human Inductive Reasoning: A Brain Informatics Perspective

Diversity Effect and It’s Mechanism of Inductive Reasoning

The Neural Mechanism of Inductive Reasoning

Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement

Meta-inductive Justification of Inductive Generalizations

On Popper's Solution to the Inductive Problem from the Perspective of Grue Problem

Comments on Two Kinds of Theories about Children's Inductive Reasoning

Hume's Problem Viewed from Bayesian Approach: A Comment on Howson's Resolution of Hume's Problem

Why is Induction A Problem?

Feature Similarity and Category Labels in Inductive Reasoning

Tractatus on Probability and Induction:a Tentative Reconstruction

Towards United Reasoning for Automatic Induction in Isabelle/HOL

A Test of The Bayesian Model of Inductive Reasoning

The Study of Informal Reasoning and Its Prospect

A Problem of Deduction That Is Similar to the Problem of Generalization: Verification of Deduction