Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

A Summary of Studies on the Meaning of Marx's New Materialism

Western Marxism's Theoretical Nature and Its Implications for China

On Marx's Transcendence over Philosophical Materialism and the Revolutionary Significance of His New Materialism——A Review of "Marx's Natural Concept" by Schimitt

Karl Korsch on Marx’s New Materialism

Concept Dimension of Historical Materialism:a New Interpretation

Is Marx a materialist

Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’

Practice and Material Production——On the Essence of Marxist New World Outlook

The Scientific Connotation of Historical Materialism and Its Practice and Development in the Context of the New Era

Historical Conception of Materialism and Enlightenment:A Re-analysis

“British Marxism”:Its History,Mode of Theorizing and Achievements in Historical Materialism

How to Understand and Interpret Marx’s Concept of Philosophy

Three Modes of Interpreting Marxism——Chinese Theorists' Studies on Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844 and Our New Viewpoints

Historical Materialism as a Philosophical Theory and As a Theory of Social History

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

A Discussion about the Ontological Foundation of Marx's Practical Materialism——As a Reply to Mr. Dong Xuewen

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

Does Marxism have the Inner Tension Between the Cultural and Natural Perspective?——On Theoretical Significance of Dialogue Between Sahlins and Historical Materialism

New Insights into Western Marxism

Materiality and Subject in Marxism, (Post-)Structuralism, and Material Semiotics

On the Philosophical Significance and Contemporary Meanings of Marx's Theory of Human Comprehensive Development