The Value of Diagnosis in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia with Colposcopically Directed Biopsy Plus Endocervical Curettage

李娟,张平,邓秋红,漆澜涛,马金花,翁秀兰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5949.2010.08.009
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of colposcopically directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage ( for short: combination method) in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ( CIN) .Methods The clinical data of 43 patients with CIN diagnosed by combination method and then treated with cervical loop electrosurgical procedure ( LEEP) were retrospectively studied.The consisten-cy of pathological examination between combination method and LEEP was evaluated.The factors of missed diagnosis of cervical invasive carcinoma were analyzed.Results The diagnosis of 31 out of the 43 patients by combination method consistent with that by LEEP patho-logic diagnosis with a consistence rate of 72.0% ,however,the diagnoses of 12 of the 43 patients by combination method were not con-sistent with those by LEEP,including 6 cases of over diagnosis ( 13.9% ,6 /43) and 6 cases of under diagnosis ( 13.9% ,6/43) .Four patients were confirmed as with cervical invasive carcinoma by LEEP at last with a missed diagnosis rate of 10.5% .The missed diagno-sis rate of invasive carcinoma by combination method was significantly higher in the patients with cytological diagnosis of with≥ASCUS-H than in the patients cytologiccally diagnosed as withASCUS-H( P0.05) .Conclusions Combination method diagnosis CIN has benefit of microtrauma and repeatablity and low missed features.The patients with cytological diagnosis of≥ASCUS-H need repeated inspection in order to avoid missed diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?