Analysis of the Outcome of Arthroscopic Nirschl Debridement for Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis

Liu Yulei,Cui Guoqing,Ao Yingfang,Xiao Jian,Yan Hui,Yu Changlong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16038/j.1000-6710.2007.04.012
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical outcome of arthroscopic Nirschl debridement for refractory lateral epicondylitis.Methods A retrospective analysis of 23 patients (24 elbows: 9 males; 14 females; aged 46.2 years averagely) who had been treated at our clinic between 2004 and 2005 was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of arthroscopic treatment. The patients received an average of 25.6 months (8~72months) of conservative treatment before surgery. The VAS (visual analog scale:0=no pain;10=severe pain) scores, duration of return to work or sports, satisfaction, stiffness of elbow and grip strength were used as parameters of curative effect. Nonparametric test or Fisher’s Exact test was employed to analyze the relation of curative effect to the factors including sex; age; occupation of the patient; the time between the onset of symptoms and the operation; the number of injections of corticosteroid; suture or drilling in operation.Results The minimum follow-up period was 4 months (average: 12.6 months), covered 100% of the patients. The curative effect in 87.5% of the patients was excellent or good, including 14 excellent (58.3%) and 7 good (29.2%), 2 were fair (8.3%) and 1 was poor (4.7%). There was no statistical significance between the outcome and the gender, age, occupation, time from onset of symptoms to the operation, the number of injection of corticosteroid, and suture or drilling in operation. Manual laborers workers took a longer time (average 2.8 months) to return to work as compared with the sedentary workers, however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.412). There were no severe complications in this clinical setting.Conclusion Arthroscopic Nirschl debridement is a reliable technique for treating patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis. There was no relation of the postoperative results to the gender; age; occupation of the patient; time between the onset of symptoms and the operation; the number of injections of corticosteroid; and suture or drilling in operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?