A Comparative Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Studies of Law Language(1998-2021):Based on Visualization Technology and Bibliometric Analysis Method
Zhang Falian,Jiang Yujing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16027/j.cnki.cn31-2043/h.2023.02.011
2023-01-01
Abstract:Based on the articles included in the core journals of CNKI and Web of Science, this paper presents a comprehensive comparison and contrast of the developments of the studies of law language between home and abroad from 1998 to 2021 based on CiteSpace visualization technology and bibliometric analysis method. The findings are as follows: 1) The number of journal articles published abroad has increased steadily. By contrast, the number in China has experienced a downward trend in recent years, which should be brought to attention; 2) In terms of the study field of the periodicals, most international articles are included in legal periodicals, supplemented by specialized periodicals of linguistics and legal language. It has attracted the common attention of the linguistic, legal, translation and foreign language study field in China; 3) The articles published in international journals mainly focus on solving legal problems through legal language. In China, language is the study object, focusing on solving language problems; 4) The research methods abroad are diverse, with much attention to solving practical problems. The domestic research method is single, with less attention to empirical study. In order to change the current study situation in China, we propose the following suggestions. Firstly, diverse and systematical research methods should be applied to explore more study objects based on China’s local practice of law. Secondly, scholars should change the study focus of emphasizing the language itself and explore more possibilities. Thirdly, discuss more practical problems to improve the depth of research and develop legal practice through related study results. The language of the law should be an effective channel to tell the story of China’s rule of law.