Effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus on chronic allograft nephropathy

TIAN Xiao-hui,XUE Wu-jun,TIAN Pu-xun,DING Xiao-ming,HOU Jun,FENG Xin-shun,PAN Xiao-ming,YAN Hang,XIANG He-li,LI Yang,DING Chen-guang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2012.06.005
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy and adverse reaction of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors(CNI) to sirolimus for treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy(CAN). Methods The objects of retrospective study were 95 recipients who developed CAN after renal transplantation and were followed up from January 2005 to December 2010 in Department of Renal Transplantation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi' an Jiaotong University. The patients all received the immunosuppressant regimen based on CNI after transplantation. This study was approved by local ethical committee and the informed consent of all participating subjects was obtained. After diagnosis of CAN, the immunosuppressant was changed from CNI to sirolimus. The maintenance dose and blood concentration of sirolimus were recorded. The change of serum creatinine (Scr) level was observed after conversion treatment. Patients were divided into high Scr level group(Scr≥266 μmol/L, n=22) and low Scr level group(Scr<266 μmol/L, n=73) before conversion. The difference of change amplitude of Scr level was compared between 2 groups after conversion treatment. The adverse reaction of conversion treatment was observed. Results Follow-up time of 95 patients ranged from 6 to 48 months. The median of maintenance dose and concentration of sirolimus were 1.5 mg/d (range from 0.5 to 4 mg/d) and 5.4 ng/ml (range from 1.3 to 12 ng/ml), respectively. The effect of conversion treatment in low Scr level group was significantly better than that in high Scr level group(P<0.05). None suffered from acute rejection. Thirty-two cases developed de novo or exacerbated proteinuria(34%), 25 cases developed de novo or exacerbated hyperlipidemia(26%)were the commonest adverse events, and 1 case developed pulmonary infection. All the patients were cured or relieved after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions It is safe and effective to convert the immunosuppressant from CNI to sirolimus for the treatment of CAN. The effect of conversion treatment in low Scr level group is significantly higher than that in high Scr level group. The major complications are proteinuria and hyperlipidemia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?