Clinical investigation on abrupt conversion of low-dose sirolimus after kidney transplantation

QIU Yong-yin,QIU Yue,WANG Xuan-chuan,ZHAO Tian,XU Ming,RONG Rui-ming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2010.03.005
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose sirolimus abrupt conversion therapy in renal allograft recipients over 3 years posttransplantation.Methods A total of 24 patients who converted from calcineurin inhibitor(CNI)-based therapy to sirolimus-based regimen because of various causes were enrolled in this study. All patients received cyclosporin or tacrolimus combined with adjunctive mycophenolate mofetil and steroids before conversion. CNI was withdrawn abruptly and replaced by 4 mg loading-dose sirolimus on the day of conversion. The dose was cut by half thereafter and was adjusted according to therapeutic drug monitoring. The targeted trough level of sirolimus was 4-6 ng/mL in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy(CAN) and 6-8 ng/mL in other subjects. We analyzed motives invoked for conversion,serum creatinine,proteinuria,lipidemia,fasting blood glucose,and blood routine before and after conversion. We also reviewed the infection rates and the prognosis of the patients who suffered from tumor and proliferative disease.Results The serum creatinine level in CAN patients remarkably decreased compared with that before conversion (P=0.002),whereas no significant change was seen in other subjects (P=0.41). A two-way fluctuation in proteinuria was observed. Serum levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol exhibited a peak at 6 month posttransplantation compared with baseline without statistical significances (P=0.80 and 0.51) and could be well controlled by statins (P=0.02),while the fasting blood glucose leveled off (P=0.211). The blood routine remained stable after conversion. The infection rates due to immunosuppression 1 year before and after conversion were similar (P=0.418). For conversion because of tumor,no clinical recurrence was observed during follow-up. One patient with urothelial carcinoma enjoyed tumor regression after conversion. No recurrent ureterostenosis was seen in 1 patient with proliferative disorder.Conclusions Low-dose sirolimus abrupt conversion was efficacious and safe for renal allograft recipients over 3 years posttransplantation. It also demonstrated special benefits from sirolimus for the patients with malignancy and proliferative disorders.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?