Abstract:Introduction and aim Acute kidney injury (AKI) is part of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill patients and is a common condition in intensive care units (ICUs). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for AKI in critically ill patients. This patient population has a high mortality rate despite RRT. There are two methods of RRT for patients in ICUs: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Both CRRT and IHD similarly provide adequate metabolic control. We aimed to compare these two RRT modalities in terms of ICU stay, mortality, and laboratory recovery in these patients with high mortality. Materials and methods A total of 120 patients with AKI who needed RRT in the ICU were included in the study (CRRT, n:40; IHD, n:80). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II scores at the time of admission to the ICU were calculated. Mean arterial pressure, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, pH, lactate, and bicarbonate levels were measured before and after dialysis. Patients were classified as living and deceased. Factors affecting the length of stay in the intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were evaluated. The variability in laboratory parameters between groups before and after dialysis was examined. The groups were compared with these parameters. Results Sixty-one point seven percent (61.7%, n:74) of the patients were female. The mean age was 62.90±13.64 years. At the time of admission to the ICU, the patients' SAPS II score was 45.05±12.76, APACHE II score was 22.05±6.32, and SOFA score was 8.26±2.48. 66.7% (n:80) of the patients included in the study died, and the length of stay of these patients in the ICU was 12.85±10.23 days. When the groups were compared, SAPS II, APACHE II scores, and SOFA scores were significantly higher in the CRRT group than in the IHD group (p:0.038, p:0.015, p:0.027, respectively). Although the length of stay in the ICU was shorter in the CRRT group, it was not statistically significant (p:0.075). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality (p: 0.891). SAPS-II, APACHE II, and SOFA score affected 30-day mortality while age, gender, and RRT modalities were not associated with mortality. The improvement in laboratory parameters between the pre and post-RRT groups was statistically more significant in the IHD group (p<0.001). It was determined that there was a statistically greater decrease in mean arterial pressure in the IHD group (p<0.001). Conclusions It was determined that there was no difference between the CRRT and IHD modalities applied in patients with AKI admitted to the ICU in terms of mortality and length of stay in the ICU. It was observed that both modalities improved on laboratory parameters, but the improvement was greater in the IHD group. However, it was determined that there was a statistically greater decrease in mean arterial pressure in the IHD group.

Comparison of Efficacy between Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis on Acute Renal Failure Associated with Multiple Organs Failure

A Retrospective Study of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Versus Intermittent Hemodialysis in Severe Acute Renal Failure

[Comparison of clinical efficacy between continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury]

Effect of Continuous Hemodialysis on the Acute Renal Failure

Application of Continous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Critical Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome

Intensive- Vs Less-Intensive-dose Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for the Intensive Care Unit–related Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Treatment of severe acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome patients with continuous renal replacement therapy

Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients With Acute Kidney İnjury Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Effect of Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration on Acute Renal Failure Following Severe Trauma

Long-term Renal and Overall Survival of Critically Ill Patients with Acute Renal Injury Who Received Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Impacts of the daytime continuous renal replacement therapy on the treatment of critical patients

Application of Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration to Severely Acute Renal Failure after Cardiac Surgery

Application of Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration in Acute Renal Failure Following Cardiac Surgery-an Analysis of Four Cases

Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients with Renal Failure in Intensive Care Unit: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of Impact of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dose on Outcome of Acute Renal Failure Patients

Application of Continuous Blood Purification and Peritoneal Dialysis to the Treatment of 36 Critical Uremia Patients

On-line Hemodiafiltration As Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Simple Acute Renal Failure

Overall Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Without Renal Damage

The timing, mode and dose of continuous renal replacement therapy in the treatment of acute kidney injury

Application of Two Kinds of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Renal Failure After Liver Transplantation

Effect of the Intensity of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury: a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial