Comparison of therapeutic effects between extended daily hemodialysis and extended daily hemofiltration for acute kidney injury after orthotopic cardiac transplantation

SHEN Bo,TENG Jie,LIU Zhonghua,ZOU Jianzhou,ZHANG Xiaoyan,FANG Yi,JI Jun,XUE Ning,CHEN Liming,LIU Hong,ZHONG Yihong,YUAN Min,FU Chensheng,YANG Shouguo,CHEN Hao,WANG Chunsheng,DING Xiaoqiang
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of extended daily hemodialysis(EDD) and extended daily hemofiltration(EDHF) in treatment of patients with acute kidney injury after orthotopic cardiac transplantation(OCT).Methods From May 2000 to September 2008,20 patients with post-OCT acute kidney injury were included in this retrospective study.Nine patients received EDD and 11 received EDHF.Temporary deep venous was used as dialysis pathway in all patients with a bedside hemodialyzer at a blood rate of 200—250 mL/min.EDD group used 1.4 m2 poly(ether sulfone) and the treatment time was ≥8 h/d.EDHF group used 1.7 m2 high-throughput poly(ether sulfone),with the total replacement volume being >48 L/d and the treatment dose being 25 mL·kg-1·h-1 and treatment time being ≥8 h/d.Parameters such as urea nitrogen,serum creatinine,heart rate(HR),mean artery pressure(MAP),central venous pressure(CVP),and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE) Ⅱ scores were observed before and 24 h and 72 h after treatment.The hospital mortality,length of ICU stay,length of RRT and the direct cost of RRT were compared between groups.Results Before treatment there was no significant difference in the general data between 2 groups except that the MAP of EDHF group was lower than that of EDD group([81.9±7.1] mmHg vs.[73.9±9.1] mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa,P<0.05).24 h after treatment,there was no significant difference of urea nitrogen,serum creatinine,HR,MAP,CVP and APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups;CVP values of both groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment([16.6±3.1] mmH2O vs.[20.8±5.0] cmH2O,1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa,P<0.05);the APACHE Ⅱ scores of EDHF group was significantly improved compared with that before treatment(15.5±4.2 vs.14.7±2.4,P<0.05);and the urea nitrogen,serum creatinine,HR,and MAP kept stable.72 h after treatment,the CVP values of both groups were further improved compared with that at 24 h after treatment [14.7±2.4 vs.16.6±3.1;[14.5±3.3] cmH2O vs.[16.5±3.3] cmH2O,P<0.05).The APACHE II scores of EDHF group was also further improved compared with those at 24h after treatment(14.1±4.6 vs.15.5±4.2,P<0.05).The urea nitrogen,serum creatinine,HR,and MAP also kept stable.There was no significant difference in hospital mortality,length of ICU stay,length of RRT between the two groups.The direct cost of RRT in EDD group was lower than that of EDHF group([9 600±2 700] yuan vs.[15 300±4 800] yuan,P<0.01).Conclusion Both EDD and EDHF are effective and safe in treatment of patients with non-septic AKI after OHT.EDD costs less than EDHF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?