Clinical Observation of Abdominal Pedicle Skin Flap and Free Skin Flap Repair in Treatment of Hand Infected Wound and Bone Exposed

朱玉花,王俊波,张全英
2013-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effects of the abdominal pedicle skin flap and free skin flap repair on the treatment of the hand infected wound and bone exposed.METHODS A total of 38 cases of patients with hand trauma wound infections and bone exposed were selected as the study objects and were randomly divided into the groupⅠ and the groupⅡaccording to the admission order with 10 cases in each.The groupⅠwas treated with the abdominal pedicle skin flap repair,and the group Ⅱ was given the acrotarsium free skin flap repair.The treatment effects of the two groups were compared.RESULTS The excellent and good rate of the treatment in the group Ⅰ was 94.73%,higher than 63.16% of the group Ⅱ,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05).The operation duration of the group Ⅰ was(52.3±23.5) min,shorter than(189.3±36.9)min of the group Ⅱ;the hospital stay of the group Ⅰwas(39.5±3.2) d,longer than(19.4±1.2) d of the group Ⅱ;the operation frequency of the group Ⅰ was(2.2±0.8) times,more than(1.0±0.2)times of the group Ⅱ;the total hospitalization cost of the groupⅠ was(12324.6 ± 145.2) yuan,higher than(8734.2±45.6) yuan of the group Ⅱ,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P 0.05).The satisfaction rate for the treatment effect of the groupⅠ was 52.63%,the group Ⅱ 73.68%,the difference was not statistically significant.CONCLUSION For the repair treatment of the hand trauma wound infection and bone exposed,the pedicle flap is with higher postoperative survival rate and has irreplaceable advantages,while the free skin flap can achieve good recovery of the shape and function,the two methods should be flexibly chosen under the technology available.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?